These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28945906)

  • 1. Use of Continuous Traits Can Improve Morphological Phylogenetics.
    Parins-Fukuchi C
    Syst Biol; 2018 Mar; 67(2):328-339. PubMed ID: 28945906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Among-character rate variation distributions in phylogenetic analysis of discrete morphological characters.
    Harrison LB; Larsson HC
    Syst Biol; 2015 Mar; 64(2):307-24. PubMed ID: 25527198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Bayesian Approach for Inferring the Impact of a Discrete Character on Rates of Continuous-Character Evolution in the Presence of Background-Rate Variation.
    May MR; Moore BR
    Syst Biol; 2020 May; 69(3):530-544. PubMed ID: 31665487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increasing the number of discrete character states for continuous characters generates well-resolved trees that do not reflect phylogeny.
    Bardin J; Rouget I; Yacobucci MM; Cecca F
    Integr Zool; 2014 Aug; 9(4):531-41. PubMed ID: 24148350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the Adequacy of Morphological Models using Posterior Predictive Simulations.
    Mulvey LPA; May MR; Brown JM; Höhna S; Wright AM; Warnock RCM
    Syst Biol; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39374100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A method for inferring the rate of evolution of homologous characters that can potentially improve phylogenetic inference, resolve deep divergence and correct systematic biases.
    Cummins CA; McInerney JO
    Syst Biol; 2011 Dec; 60(6):833-44. PubMed ID: 21804093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Geometric morphometric character suites as phylogenetic data: extracting phylogenetic signal from gastropod shells.
    Smith UE; Hendricks JR
    Syst Biol; 2013 May; 62(3):366-85. PubMed ID: 23325808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel method for jointly modeling the evolution of discrete and continuous traits.
    Boyko JD; O'Meara BC; Beaulieu JM
    Evolution; 2023 Mar; 77(3):836-851. PubMed ID: 36723908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Handling Logical Character Dependency in Phylogenetic Inference: Extensive Performance Testing of Assumptions and Solutions Using Simulated and Empirical Data.
    Simões TR; Vernygora OV; de Medeiros BAS; Wright AM
    Syst Biol; 2023 Jun; 72(3):662-680. PubMed ID: 36773019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative method for both discrete and continuous characters using the threshold model.
    Felsenstein J
    Am Nat; 2012 Feb; 179(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 22218305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inferring Bounded Evolution in Phenotypic Characters from Phylogenetic Comparative Data.
    Boucher FC; Démery V
    Syst Biol; 2016 Jul; 65(4):651-61. PubMed ID: 26865274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fast Bayesian Inference of Phylogenies from Multiple Continuous Characters.
    Zhang R; Drummond AJ; Mendes FK
    Syst Biol; 2024 May; 73(1):102-124. PubMed ID: 38085256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling Character Change Heterogeneity in Phylogenetic Analyses of Morphology through the Use of Priors.
    Wright AM; Lloyd GT; Hillis DM
    Syst Biol; 2016 Jul; 65(4):602-11. PubMed ID: 26715586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the efficacy of continuous quantitative characters for reconstructing the phylogeny of a morphologically homogeneous spider taxon (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Antrodiaetidae, Antrodiaetus).
    Hendrixson BE; Bond JE
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Oct; 53(1):300-13. PubMed ID: 19523525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian Estimation of Species Divergence Times Using Correlated Quantitative Characters.
    Álvarez-Carretero S; Goswami A; Yang Z; Dos Reis M
    Syst Biol; 2019 Nov; 68(6):967-986. PubMed ID: 30816937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do morphometric data improve phylogenetic reconstruction? A systematic review and assessment.
    Holvast EJ; Celik MA; Phillips MJ; Wilson LAB
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2024 Oct; 24(1):127. PubMed ID: 39425066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Partially incorrect fossil data augment analyses of discrete trait evolution in living species.
    Puttick MN
    Biol Lett; 2016 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 27484647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morphological Phylogenetics Evaluated Using Novel Evolutionary Simulations.
    Keating JN; Sansom RS; Sutton MD; Knight CG; Garwood RJ
    Syst Biol; 2020 Sep; 69(5):897-912. PubMed ID: 32073641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian methods outperform parsimony but at the expense of precision in the estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data.
    O'Reilly JE; Puttick MN; Parry L; Tanner AR; Tarver JE; Fleming J; Pisani D; Donoghue PC
    Biol Lett; 2016 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 27095266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ontogenetic Data Analyzed As Such in Phylogenies.
    Bardin J; Rouget I; Cecca F
    Syst Biol; 2017 Jan; 66(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 28173595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.