These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28947082)

  • 1. Facilitation and refractoriness of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Hey M; Müller-Deile J; Hessel H; Killian M
    Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 355():14-22. PubMed ID: 28947082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Laurello SA
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():116-129. PubMed ID: 28633960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring temporal response properties of auditory nerve fibers in cochlear implant recipients.
    Tabibi S; Kegel A; Lai WK; Bruce IC; Dillier N
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():187-196. PubMed ID: 31325737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recovery characteristics of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve in deafened guinea pigs: relation to neuronal status.
    Ramekers D; Versnel H; Strahl SB; Klis SF; Grolman W
    Hear Res; 2015 Mar; 321():12-24. PubMed ID: 25582354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 5. refractory recovery and facilitation.
    Cohen LT
    Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 248(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 19110048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high rates.
    Haenggeli A; Zhang JS; Vischer MW; Pelizzone M; Rouiller EM
    Audiology; 1998; 37(6):353-71. PubMed ID: 9888192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of neural adaptation and degeneration on pulse-train ECAPs: A model study.
    van Gendt MJ; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():167-178. PubMed ID: 30947041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness.
    Botros A; Psarros C
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):380-91. PubMed ID: 20090532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SpeedCAP: An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound Action-Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Garcia C; Deeks JM; Goehring T; Borsetto D; Bance M; Carlyon RP
    Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):627-640. PubMed ID: 36477611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spread of excitation varies for different electrical pulse shapes and stimulation modes in cochlear implants.
    Undurraga JA; Carlyon RP; Macherey O; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):21-36. PubMed ID: 22583921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
    Telmesani LM; Said NM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.
    Scheperle RA; Tejani VD; Omtvedt JK; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Oleson JJ; Ozanne MV
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():45-57. PubMed ID: 28432874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic-electric interactions in the guinea pig auditory nerve: simultaneous and forward masking of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Nourski KV; Abbas PJ; Miller CA; Robinson BK; Jeng FC
    Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 232(1-2):87-103. PubMed ID: 17723284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring the refractoriness of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.
    Morsnowski A; Charasse B; Collet L; Killian M; Müller-Deile J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(6):389-402. PubMed ID: 17008774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Facilitation properties in electrically evoked compound action potentials depending on spatial location and on threshold.
    Dambon J; Mewes A; Beyer A; Dambon J; Ambrosch P; Hey M
    Hear Res; 2023 Oct; 438():108858. PubMed ID: 37556897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Users: Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Data Using Pulse Train Maskers.
    Adel Y; Hilkhuysen G; Noreña A; Cazals Y; Roman S; Macherey O
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 18(3):495-512. PubMed ID: 28224320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
    van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.