These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28947159)

  • 1. A sensitivity analysis method for the body segment inertial parameters based on ground reaction and joint moment regressor matrices.
    Futamure S; Bonnet V; Dumas R; Venture G
    J Biomech; 2017 Nov; 64():85-92. PubMed ID: 28947159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examination of Inertial Sensor-Based Estimation Methods of Lower Limb Joint Moments and Ground Reaction Force: Results for Squat and Sit-to-Stand Movements in the Sagittal Plane.
    Kodama J; Watanabe T
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Aug; 16(8):. PubMed ID: 27490544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity analysis of human lower extremity joint moments due to changes in joint kinematics.
    Ardestani MM; Moazen M; Jin Z
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Feb; 37(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 25553962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are patient-specific joint and inertial parameters necessary for accurate inverse dynamics analyses of gait?
    Reinbolt JA; Haftka RT; Chmielewski TL; Fregly BJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 May; 54(5):782-93. PubMed ID: 17518274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An efficient probabilistic methodology for incorporating uncertainty in body segment parameters and anatomical landmarks in joint loadings estimated from inverse dynamics.
    Langenderfer JE; Laz PJ; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Feb; 130(1):014502. PubMed ID: 18298193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity of forelimb swing phase inverse dynamics to inertial parameter errors.
    Lanovaz JL; Clayton HM
    Equine Vet J Suppl; 2001 Apr; (33):27-31. PubMed ID: 11721563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of passive elastic joint moment-angle relationships in the lower extremity.
    Silder A; Whittington B; Heiderscheit B; Thelen DG
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(12):2628-35. PubMed ID: 17359981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Global sensitivity analysis of the joint kinematics during gait to the parameters of a lower limb multi-body model.
    El Habachi A; Moissenet F; Duprey S; Cheze L; Dumas R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Jul; 53(7):655-67. PubMed ID: 25783762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consistent accuracy in whole-body joint kinetics during gait using wearable inertial motion sensors and in-shoe pressure sensors.
    Khurelbaatar T; Kim K; Lee S; Kim YH
    Gait Posture; 2015 Jun; 42(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 25957652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Whole body inverse dynamics over a complete gait cycle based only on measured kinematics.
    Ren L; Jones RK; Howard D
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2750-9. PubMed ID: 18672243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of Ground Reaction Forces and Moments During Gait Using Only Inertial Motion Capture.
    Karatsidis A; Bellusci G; Schepers HM; de Zee M; Andersen MS; Veltink PH
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 28042857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methodological factors affecting joint moments estimation in clinical gait analysis: a systematic review.
    Camomilla V; Cereatti A; Cutti AG; Fantozzi S; Stagni R; Vannozzi G
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Aug; 16(1):106. PubMed ID: 28821242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of perturbing body segment parameters on calculated joint moments and muscle forces during gait.
    Wesseling M; de Groote F; Jonkers I
    J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 24332615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contributions to the understanding of gait control.
    Simonsen EB
    Dan Med J; 2014 Apr; 61(4):B4823. PubMed ID: 24814597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating 3D L5/S1 moments and ground reaction forces during trunk bending using a full-body ambulatory inertial motion capture system.
    Faber GS; Chang CC; Kingma I; Dennerlein JT; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):904-912. PubMed ID: 26795123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A computational model for dynamic analysis of the human gait.
    Vimieiro C; Andrada E; Witte H; Pinotti M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 24156601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contribution of passive actions to the lower limb joint moments and powers during gait: A comparison of models.
    Gasparutto X; Jacquelin E; Dumas R
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Aug; 232(8):768-778. PubMed ID: 30004297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of different inertial parameter sets on joint moment calculation during stair ascending and descending.
    Fantozzi S; Stagni R; Cappello A; Leardini A
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jul; 27(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 15990070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of body segments' parameters estimation models on inverse dynamics solutions during gait.
    Rao G; Amarantini D; Berton E; Favier D
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(8):1531-6. PubMed ID: 15970198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-dimensional link-segment model of the forelimb of dogs at a walk.
    Nielsen C; Stover SM; Schulz KS; Hubbard M; Hawkins DA
    Am J Vet Res; 2003 May; 64(5):609-17. PubMed ID: 12755302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.