BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

509 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28947370)

  • 1. Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components Reduce the Risk of Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matched Study From the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):447-452. PubMed ID: 28947370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trabecular Metal Versus Non-Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components and the Risk of Re-Revision Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jul; 100(13):1132-1140. PubMed ID: 29975265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components Reduce the Risk of Rerevision After Revision THA Performed for Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Study Using the NJR Data Set.
    Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jun; 477(6):1382-1389. PubMed ID: 31136438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the rate of revision of 36 mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with Pinnacle acetabular components related to the year of the initial operation? an interrupted time-series analysis using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    Matharu GS; Hunt LP; Murray DW; Howard P; Pandit HG; Blom AW; Bolland B; Judge A
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 29305448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.
    Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):245-258. PubMed ID: 29529653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trabecular metal versus non-trabecular metal acetabular components for acetabular revision surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shen X; Qin Y; Li Y; Tang X; Xiao J
    Int J Surg; 2022 Apr; 100():106597. PubMed ID: 35288338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative long-term survivorship of uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Kremers HM; Howard JL; Loechler Y; Schleck CD; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ; Cabanela ME; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e82. PubMed ID: 22717834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revision for Aseptic Loosening of Highly Porous Acetabular Components in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 20,993 Total Hip Replacements.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Holder C; Graves SE; Bingham R
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Feb; 37(2):312-315. PubMed ID: 34699913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients at High Risk for Dislocation.
    Harwin SF; Mistry JB; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Gwam C; Newman JM; Higuera CA; Bonutti PM; Malkani AL; Kolisek FR; Delanois RE; Mont MA
    Surg Technol Int; 2017 Jul; 30():251-258. PubMed ID: 28395391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Fracture Is Associated With Lower Survivorship and More Complications.
    Morison Z; Moojen DJ; Nauth A; Hall J; McKee MD; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 26335343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metal-on-conventional polyethylene total hip arthroplasty bearing surfaces have a higher risk of revision than metal-on-highly crosslinked polyethylene: results from a US registry.
    Paxton EW; Inacio MC; Namba RS; Love R; Kurtz SM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Mar; 473(3):1011-21. PubMed ID: 25560957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early aseptic loosening of cementless monoblock acetabular components.
    Miettinen SS; Mäkinen TJ; Laaksonen I; Mäkelä K; Huhtala H; Kettunen J; Remes V
    Int Orthop; 2017 Apr; 41(4):715-722. PubMed ID: 27506571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Treatment of acetabular defects with the trabecular metal revision system].
    Wassilew GI; Janz V; Perka C; Müller M
    Orthopade; 2017 Feb; 46(2):148-157. PubMed ID: 28083681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.
    Varnum C
    Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What Is the Risk of Revision Surgery in Hydroxyapatite-coated Femoral Hip Stems? Findings From a Large National Registry.
    Inacio MC; Lorimer M; Davidson DC; De Steiger RN; Lewis PL; Graves SE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2353-2366. PubMed ID: 30303878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Management of Failed Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
    Rahman WA; Amenábar T; Hetaimish BM; Safir OA; Kuzyk PR; Gross AE
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2559-2563. PubMed ID: 27378637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The design of the acetabular component and size of the femoral head influence the risk of revision following 34 721 single-brand cemented hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study of medium-term data from a National Joint Registry.
    Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Gregg PJ; Brewster N; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Dec; 94(12):1611-7. PubMed ID: 23188900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: A 62 case series at a minimum 5 years' follow-up.
    Lebeau N; Bayle M; Belhaouane R; Chelli M; Havet E; Brunschweiler B; Mertl P
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):679-684. PubMed ID: 28578096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constrained Acetabular Components Used in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Registry Analysis.
    Lewis PL; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Cuthbert AR
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Oct; 32(10):3102-3107. PubMed ID: 28576624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.