These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28949807)

  • 1. Pesticide dispersion by spraying under tropical conditions.
    Langenbach T; Mano D; Campos MM; Cunha ALMC; De Campos TMP
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2017 Dec; 52(12):843-849. PubMed ID: 28949807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spray drift as affected by meteorological conditions.
    Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 16628942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spray drift reduction under Southern European conditions: a pilot study in the Ecopest Project in Greece.
    Kasiotis KM; Glass CR; Tsakirakis AN; Machera K
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 479-480():132-7. PubMed ID: 24561292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary and secondary pesticide drift profiles from a peach orchard.
    Zivan O; Bohbot-Raviv Y; Dubowski Y
    Chemosphere; 2017 Jun; 177():303-310. PubMed ID: 28314235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.
    Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of hedgerows to mitigate pesticide exposure of a population living in a rural area.
    Langenbach T; Mager AH; Campos MM; De Falco A; Aucélio R; Campos TM; Caldas LQA
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2022 Jan; 18(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 34002477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spray Drift from a Conventional Axial Fan Airblast Sprayer in a Modern Orchard Work Environment.
    Kasner EJ; Fenske RA; Hoheisel GA; Galvin K; Blanco MN; Seto EYW; Yost MG
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2018 Nov; 62(9):1134-1146. PubMed ID: 30346469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of natural windbreaks on drift reduction in orchard spraying.
    Wenneker M; Heijne B; van de Zande JC
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):961-9. PubMed ID: 16628943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strategies for reducing airborne pesticides under tropical conditions.
    Langenbach T; Caldas LQ
    Ambio; 2018 Sep; 47(5):574-584. PubMed ID: 29243054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 3: field drift experiments.
    Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Dekeyser D; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):763-7. PubMed ID: 19226826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the AGDISP model for predicting airborne atrazine spray drift: A South African ground application case study.
    Nsibande SA; Dabrowski JM; van der Walt E; Venter A; Forbes PB
    Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():454-61. PubMed ID: 26171732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Drift studies--comparison of field and wind tunnel experiments.
    Stadler R; Regenauer W
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):971-3. PubMed ID: 16628944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 4: a comparative study.
    Nuyttens D; Baetens K; De Schampheleire M; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):769-74. PubMed ID: 19226827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of collectors of airborne spray drift. Experiments in a wind tunnel and field measurements.
    Arvidsson T; Bergström L; Kreuger J
    Pest Manag Sci; 2011 Jun; 67(6):725-33. PubMed ID: 21445941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Off-target loss in ornamental nurseries with different spray techniques.
    Zhu H; Derksen RC; Krause CR; Zondag RH
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 20218508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 2: wind tunnel experiments.
    Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):757-61. PubMed ID: 19226825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Real-Time Monitoring of Spray Drift from Three Different Orchard Sprayers.
    Blanco MN; Fenske RA; Kasner EJ; Yost MG; Seto E; Austin E
    Chemosphere; 2019 May; 222():46-55. PubMed ID: 30690400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting aerial spray drift in the Brazilian Cerrado.
    Baio FHR; Antuniassi UR; Castilho BR; Teodoro PE; Silva EED
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212289. PubMed ID: 30779797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of different sampling techniques for the evaluation of pesticide spray drift in apple orchards.
    Briand O; Bertrand F; Seux R; Millet M
    Sci Total Environ; 2002 Apr; 288(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 11991524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Winds of change, developing a non-target plant bioassay employing field-based pesticide drift exposure: A case study with atrazine.
    Brain R; Goodwin G; Abi-Akar F; Lee B; Rodgers C; Flatt B; Lynn A; Kruger G; Perkins D
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Aug; 678():239-252. PubMed ID: 31075591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.