329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28949842)
1. Perspectives of IRB chairs on the informed consent process.
Kane EI; Gallo JJ
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 28949842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reading Level and Comprehension of Research Consent Forms: An Integrative Review.
Foe G; Larson EL
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Feb; 11(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 27106889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Moving Forward on Consent Practices in Australia.
McWhirter RE; Eckstein L
J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Jun; 15(2):243-257. PubMed ID: 29532387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of the institutional review board in quality improvement: a survey of quality officers, institutional review board chairs, and journal editors.
Lindenauer PK; Benjamin EM; Naglieri-Prescod D; Fitzgerald J; Pekow P
Am J Med; 2002 Nov; 113(7):575-9. PubMed ID: 12459404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Practice of Research Ethics in Lebanon and Qatar: Perspectives of Researchers on Informed Consent.
Nakkash R; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Wright K; El-Alti L; Makhoul J; Al-Ali K
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):352-362. PubMed ID: 28905673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are research participants truly informed? Readability of informed consent forms used in research.
Ogloff JR; Otto RK
Ethics Behav; 1991; 1(4):239-52. PubMed ID: 11651140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Consent form readability in university-sponsored research.
Goldstein AO; Frasier P; Curtis P; Reid A; Kreher NE
J Fam Pract; 1996 Jun; 42(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 8656172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. IRB Policies for Obtaining Informed Consent from Non-English-Speaking People.
McMillan G
Ethics Hum Res; 2020 May; 42(3):21-29. PubMed ID: 32421949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exception From Informed Consent: How IRB Reviewers Assess Community Consultation and Public Disclosure.
Chisolm-Straker M; Nassisi D; Daya MR; Cook JNB; Wilets IF; Clesca C; Richardson LD
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 32990501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed Consent for Online Research-Is Anybody Reading?: Assessing Comprehension and Individual Differences in Readings of Digital Consent Forms.
Geier C; Adams RB; Mitchell KM; Holtz BE
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2021 Jul; 16(3):154-164. PubMed ID: 34029168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Easy-to-Read Informed Consent Form for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Clinical Trials: Results from the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1205 Study.
Spellecy R; Tarima S; Denzen E; Moore H; Abhyankar S; Dawson P; Foley A; Gersten I; Horwitz M; Idossa L; Joffe S; Kamani N; King R; Lazaryan A; Morris L; Horowitz MM; Majhail NS
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2018 Oct; 24(10):2145-2151. PubMed ID: 29679770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consent form heterogeneity in cancer trials: the cooperative group and institutional review board gap.
Koyfman SA; Agre P; Carlisle R; Classen L; Cheatham C; Finley JP; Kuhrik N; Kuhrik M; Mangskau TK; O'Neill J; Reddy CP; Kodish E; McCabe MS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Jul; 105(13):947-53. PubMed ID: 23821757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. IRB intervention in the consent process.
Robertson JA
IRB; 1982 May; 4(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent for research on stored blood and tissue samples: a survey of institutional review board practices.
White MT; Gamm J
Account Res; 2002; 9(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 12705242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent for research: a study to evaluate readability and processability to effect change.
Philipson SJ; Doyle MA; Gabram SG; Nightingale C; Philipson EH
J Investig Med; 1995 Oct; 43(5):459-67. PubMed ID: 8528757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed Consent-Uninformed Participants: Shortcomings of Online Social Science Consent Forms and Recommendations for Improvement.
Perrault EK; Nazione SA
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Jul; 11(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 27329533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the Nature of IRB Contingencies Required for Informed Consent Document Approval.
Blackwood RA; Maio RF; Mrdjenovich AJ; VandenBosch TM; Gordon PS; Shipman EL; Hamilton TA
Account Res; 2015; 22(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 25897768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent and genomic incidental findings: IRB chair perspectives.
Simon CM; Williams JK; Shinkunas L; Brandt D; Daack-Hirsch S; Driessnack M
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2011 Dec; 6(4):53-67. PubMed ID: 22228060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A qualitative study of institutional review board members' experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent.
McClure KB; Delorio NM; Schmidt TA; Chiodo G; Gorman P
J Med Ethics; 2007 May; 33(5):289-93. PubMed ID: 17470507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Institutional Review Board (IRB) review lacks impact on the readability of consent forms for research.
Hammerschmidt DE; Keane MA
Am J Med Sci; 1992 Dec; 304(6):348-51. PubMed ID: 1456273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
