196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2895140)
1. Antimicrobial properties of antiseptic-impregnated biological dressings.
Kearney JN; Arain T; Holland KT
J Hosp Infect; 1988 Jan; 11(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 2895140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ag5IO6: novel antibiofilm activity of a silver compound with application to medical devices.
Incani V; Omar A; Prosperi-Porta G; Nadworny P
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2015 Jun; 45(6):586-93. PubMed ID: 25604278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 0.01% Hypochlorous Acid as an Alternative Skin Antiseptic: An In Vitro Comparison.
Anagnostopoulos AG; Rong A; Miller D; Tran AQ; Head T; Lee MC; Lee WW
Dermatol Surg; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1489-1493. PubMed ID: 29985866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of human acute wound fluid on the antibacterial efficacy of different antiseptic polyurethane foam dressings: An in vitro analysis.
Rembe JD; Fromm-Dornieden C; Böhm J; Stuermer EK
Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Jan; 26(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 29363857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Povidone-iodine ointment demonstrates in vitro efficacy against biofilm formation.
Hoekstra MJ; Westgate SJ; Mueller S
Int Wound J; 2017 Feb; 14(1):172-179. PubMed ID: 26968574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of copper and zinc ions on the germicidal properties of two popular pharmaceutical antiseptic agents cetylpyridinium chloride and povidone-iodine.
Zeelie JJ; McCarthy TJ
Analyst; 1998 Mar; 123(3):503-7. PubMed ID: 9659710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. pH influence on antibacterial efficacy of common antiseptic substances.
Wiegand C; Abel M; Ruth P; Elsner P; Hipler UC
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2015; 28(3):147-58. PubMed ID: 25614073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proposed phase 2/ step 2 in-vitro test on basis of EN 14561 for standardised testing of the wound antiseptics PVP-iodine, chlorhexidine digluconate, polihexanide and octenidine dihydrochloride.
Schedler K; Assadian O; Brautferger U; Müller G; Koburger T; Classen S; Kramer A
BMC Infect Dis; 2017 Feb; 17(1):143. PubMed ID: 28193164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative in vitro efficacies and antimicrobial durabilities of novel antimicrobial central venous catheters.
Hanna H; Bahna P; Reitzel R; Dvorak T; Chaiban G; Hachem R; Raad I
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2006 Oct; 50(10):3283-8. PubMed ID: 17005806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of antimicrobial activity of selected, commercially available wound dressing materials.
Szweda P; Gorczyca G; Tylingo R
J Wound Care; 2018 May; 27(5):320-326. PubMed ID: 29738292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antimicrobial activity of clinically used antiseptics and wound irrigating agents in combination with wound dressings.
Hirsch T; Limoochi-Deli S; Lahmer A; Jacobsen F; Goertz O; Steinau HU; Seipp HM; Steinstraesser L
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Apr; 127(4):1539-1545. PubMed ID: 21187812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro penetration of topical antiseptics through eschar of burn patients.
Stefanides MM; Copeland CE; Kominos SD; Yee RB
Ann Surg; 1976 Apr; 183(4):358-64. PubMed ID: 1267492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro study of antimicrobial activity and efficacy of iodine-generating hydrogel dressings.
Thorn RM; Greenman J; Austin A
J Wound Care; 2006 Jul; 15(7):305-10. PubMed ID: 16869198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New in vitro model evaluating antiseptics' efficacy in biofilm-associated Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic vascular graft infection.
Staneviciute E; Na'amnih W; Kavaliauskas P; Prakapaite R; Ridziauskas M; Kevlicius L; Kirkliauskiene A; Zabulis V; Urboniene J; Triponis V
J Med Microbiol; 2019 Mar; 68(3):432-439. PubMed ID: 30735113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antimicrobial efficacy of biocides tested on skin using an ex-vivo test.
Maillard JY; Messager S; Veillon R
J Hosp Infect; 1998 Dec; 40(4):313-23. PubMed ID: 9868624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Antiseptic Efficacy of Povidone Iodine and Chlorhexidine Gluconate Skin Preparation Solutions Used in Burns Surgery.
Smock E; Demertzi E; Abdolrasouli A; Azadian B; Williams G
J Burn Care Res; 2018 Apr; 39(3):440-444. PubMed ID: 29897541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antimicrobial activity of antiseptic-coated orthopaedic devices.
Darouiche RO; Green G; Mansouri MD
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 1998 Apr; 10(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 9624548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro test of the efficacy of silver-containing wound dressings against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in simulated wound fluid.
Said J; Dodoo CC; Walker M; Parsons D; Stapleton P; Beezer AE; Gaisford S
Int J Pharm; 2014 Feb; 462(1-2):123-8. PubMed ID: 24374221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro assessment of chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated polyurethane foam antimicrobial dressing using zone of inhibition assays.
Bhende S; Spangler D
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 25(8):664-7. PubMed ID: 15357158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of internally validated
Suleman L; Purcell L; Thomas H; Westgate S
J Wound Care; 2020 Mar; 29(3):154-161. PubMed ID: 32160088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
