These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28952349)

  • 61. Intention to return in residents of Okuma and its characteristics: the evacuation order was lifted eight years after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident.
    Matsunaga H; Orita M; Oishi K; Taira Y; Takamura N
    J Radiat Res; 2021 Sep; 62(5):868-870. PubMed ID: 34313302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Long-term Follow-up of Affected Residents After Lifting Evacuation Orders in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan: Findings from an Interview-Based Psychological Survey.
    Kuroda Y; Koyama Y
    Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2022 Aug; 16(4):1545-1551. PubMed ID: 34392869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A GIS-based evaluation of the effect of decontamination on effective doses due to long-term external exposures in Fukushima.
    Yasutaka T; Iwasaki Y; Hashimoto S; Naito W; Ono K; Kishimoto A; Yoshida K; Murakami M; Kawaguchi I; Oka T; Nakanishi J
    Chemosphere; 2013 Oct; 93(6):1222-9. PubMed ID: 23916213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Radiation Exposure and Thyroid Cancer Risk After the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident in Comparison with the Chernobyl Accident.
    Yamashita S; Takamura N; Ohtsuru A; Suzuki S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 171(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 27473699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. 131I DOSE ESTIMATION FROM INTAKE OF TAP WATER IN THE EARLY PHASE AFTER FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ACCIDENT.
    Kawai M; Yoshizawa N; Suzuki G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Apr; 179(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 29618130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Pathological characteristics of thyroid glands from Japanese Black Cattle living in the restricted area of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident.
    Sasaki J; Uehara M; Sato I; Satoh H; Deguchi Y; Chida H; Natsuhori M; Murata T; Ochiai K; Otani K; Okada K; Ito N
    Anim Sci J; 2019 Sep; 90(9):1333-1339. PubMed ID: 31309667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Dose-reduction Effects of Vehicles against Gamma Radiation in the Case of a Nuclear Accident.
    Takahara S; Watanabe M; Hirouchi J; Iijima M; Munakata M
    Health Phys; 2018 Jan; 114(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 30085970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Considerations and challenges in the ICRP dialogues.
    Hanzawa T
    Ann ICRP; 2016 Dec; 45(2_suppl):119-122. PubMed ID: 27913701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. [Suicide rates and mental health measures after the lifting of the evacuation orders following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident: A practical report developed in collaboration with the local municipality].
    Orui M; Kuroda Y; Yasumura S
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2019; 66(8):407-416. PubMed ID: 31548449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Lessons learned: Radiological protection for emergency workers at the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi APP (part 1).
    Yasui S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(11):D151-8. PubMed ID: 24116670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Development of Behavior Abnormalities in a Patient Prevented From Returning Home After Evacuation Following the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster: Case Report.
    Hori A; Ozaki A; Murakami M; Tsubokura M
    Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2021 Dec; 15(6):804-807. PubMed ID: 32703325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Measuring, discussing, and living together: lessons from 4 years in Suetsugi.
    Ando R
    Ann ICRP; 2016 Jun; 45(1 Suppl):75-83. PubMed ID: 26626285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [Report from Minamisoma City: diversity and complexity of psychological distress in local residents after a nuclear power plant accident].
    Hori A; Tsumuraya K; Kanamori R; Maeda M; Yabe H; Niwa S
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2014; 116(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 24783444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Body Surface Contamination Levels of Residents under Different Evacuation Scenarios after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident.
    Ohba T; Hasegawa A; Kohayagawa Y; Kondo H; Suzuki G
    Health Phys; 2017 Sep; 113(3):175-182. PubMed ID: 28749808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on background radiation doses measured by control dosimeters in Japan.
    Romanyukha A; King DL; Kennemur LK
    Health Phys; 2012 May; 102(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 22469931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Health issues today in affected areas near Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.
    Tanigawa K
    Ann ICRP; 2021 Jul; 50(1_suppl):90-94. PubMed ID: 34078138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. A farmhouse son-in-law and radiation.
    Endo S
    Ann ICRP; 2016 Dec; 45(2_suppl):71-77. PubMed ID: 28067537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Internet usage and knowledge of radiation health effects and preventive behaviours among workers in Fukushima after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident.
    Kanda H; Takahashi K; Sugaya N; Mizushima S; Koyama K
    Emerg Med J; 2014 Oct; 31(e1):e60-5. PubMed ID: 24127108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Lessons learned from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident: efficient education items of radiation safety for general public.
    Ohno K; Endo K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):510-2. PubMed ID: 25889605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Measurement and communication: what worked and what did not in Fukushima.
    Hayano R
    Ann ICRP; 2016 Dec; 45(2_suppl):14-22. PubMed ID: 27630158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.