81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28953129)
1. Doctors in Denial: The Forgotten Women in the "Unfortunate Experiment".
Wilkinson EJ
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Oct; 21(4):336. PubMed ID: 28953129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The "unfortunate experiment" that was not, and the indebtedness of women and children to Herbert ("Herb") Green (1916-2001).
Chalmers I
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 122():A14-A20. PubMed ID: 32448442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The participation of Hans Hinselmann in medical experiments at Auschwitz.
Halioua B
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Jan; 14(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20040829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The 1960s cervical screening incident at National Women's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand: insights for screening research, policy making, and practice.
Raffle AE; Gray JAM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 122():A8-A13. PubMed ID: 32448444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revisiting New Zealand's "Unfortunate Experiment": Is medical ethics ever a thing done?
Batt S
Indian J Med Ethics; 2018; 3(2):142-146. PubMed ID: 29251607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cervical cancer screening in Hungary--epidemiologic, historical and methodologic aspects].
Langmár Z; Németh M; Kornya L
Orv Hetil; 2011 Dec; 152(51):2063-6. PubMed ID: 22130204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The evolution of the Papanicolaou smear.
Tambouret RH
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 56(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 23314726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical cancer screening in Latvia: a brief history and recent improvements (2009-2011).
Vīberga I; Poljak M
Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat; 2013; 22(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 23674182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Confusion surrounding the unfortunate experiment.
Overton E
N Z Med J; 2010 Sep; 123(1323):84. PubMed ID: 20930918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Unfortunate Experiment debate: Manning response to Chalmers.
Manning J
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1320):113-4. PubMed ID: 20720612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of a two- versus three-yearly cervical screening interval recommendation on cervical cancer incidence and mortality: an analysis of trends in Australia, New Zealand, and England.
Simonella L; Canfell K
Cancer Causes Control; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1727-36. PubMed ID: 23832659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Audit of cervical screening in women with HIV infection in the Auckland and Northland regions of New Zealand.
Grewal J; Lowe M; Gerrard H; Henley R; Perkins N; Briggs S
N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):71-8. PubMed ID: 20717179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The 1987 National Women's Hospital 'Unfortunate experiment'.
Overton GH
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Apr; 51(2):184; author reply 185-6. PubMed ID: 21466525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical cytology in the Auckland region.
Jones RW; Yeong ML; Stewart AW; Hitchcock GC; Dervan WE
N Z Med J; 1988 Mar; 101(842):132-5. PubMed ID: 2832794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Beliefs, perceptions and health-seeking behaviours in relation to cervical cancer: a qualitative study among women in Uganda following completion of an HPV vaccination campaign.
Hasahya OT; Berggren V; Sematimba D; Nabirye RC; Kumakech E
Glob Health Action; 2016; 9():29336. PubMed ID: 26895145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Historical Analysis of the Brazilian Cervical Cancer Screening Program from 2006 to 2013: A Time for Reflection.
Costa RF; Longatto-Filho A; Pinheiro C; Zeferino LC; Fregnani JH
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138945. PubMed ID: 26402737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [History of the development of screening tests for cervical cancer].
Herrera YA; Piña-Sánchez P
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2015; 53(6):670-7. PubMed ID: 26506482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening for cervical cancer: attitudes and policies among Auckland general practitioners.
McMaster H; Arroll B
N Z Med J; 1992 Apr; 105(931):125-7. PubMed ID: 1560922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sociocultural barriers to cervical screening in South Auckland, New Zealand.
Lovell S; Kearns RA; Friesen W
Soc Sci Med; 2007 Jul; 65(1):138-50. PubMed ID: 17433510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Response to Elizabeth Overton's comments about Ron Jones' research.
McCredie M; Jones RW
N Z Med J; 2010 Dec; 123(1327):160-3. PubMed ID: 21358797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
