BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28953129)

  • 21. Historical aspects of cervical cancer in New Zealand: concepts and treatment up to 1941.
    Chang AR
    N Z Med J; 1988 Aug; 101(851):514-7. PubMed ID: 3043285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Letter to the editor: The 1960s cervical screening incident at National Women's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
    Skegg DCG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():235-236. PubMed ID: 33190727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Response to above Commentaries and Letters by the authors of "The 1960s cervical screening incident at National Women's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand: insights for screening research, policy making, and practice".
    Raffle AE; Gray JAM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():237-240. PubMed ID: 33190728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. "An unfortunate experiment": the New Zealand study of cancer of the cervix.
    Flagler EA; Winkler ER
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1992 Apr; 25(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 11651258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does screening history explain the ethnic differences in stage at diagnosis of cervical cancer in New Zealand?
    Brewer N; Pearce N; Jeffreys M; Borman B; Ellison-Loschmann L
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Feb; 39(1):156-65. PubMed ID: 19808843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of ThinPrep Imager-assisted with manual screening, and its place in the New Zealand cervical cancer screening program.
    Yeong ML; Pringle E; Stewart J; Retter E
    Pathology; 2013 Aug; 45(5):474-7. PubMed ID: 23856838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. "Because of their praiseworthy modesty, they consult too late": regime of hope and cancer of the womb, 1800-1910.
    Löwy I
    Bull Hist Med; 2011; 85(3):356-83. PubMed ID: 22080796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Correcting an error but inadequate treatment of cervical cancer still occurred.
    Matheson C
    N Z Med J; 2010 Sep; 123(1323):83. PubMed ID: 20930917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A study of Pap test history and histologically determined cervical cancer in NSW women, 1997-2003.
    Morrell S; Taylor R; Wain G
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 16417696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A response to Ms Sandercock and Dr Burls regarding the methods used in the analysis for our first paper 'Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3'.
    McCredie M
    N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):105-7. PubMed ID: 20927168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cytological screening for cervical cancer prevention.
    Denny L
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Apr; 26(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 22071306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The challenge of eliminating cervical cancer in the United States: a story of politics, prudishness, and prevention.
    Fisher JW; Brundage SI
    Women Health; 2009; 49(2-3):246-61. PubMed ID: 19533513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Changes in Knowledge and Beliefs About Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals in Low-Income Women After an Educational Intervention.
    Roland KB; Benard VB; Greek A; Hawkins NA; Lin L
    J Prim Care Community Health; 2016 Apr; 7(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 26763304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Family Planning--an evolving service.
    Halligan S
    Nurs N Z; 2016 Mar; 22(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 27183691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Past experience of SUUB's Pathology Department in classic based cervico-vaginal cytology.
    Lăzăroiu AM; Comănescu M; Moldovan V; Secară D; Cîrstoiu M; Sajin M; Stoian M; Anton G
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2009; 50(4):619-23. PubMed ID: 19942956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A response to Professor Bryder's comments on 'Consequences in women of participating in a study of the natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3'.
    McCredie M
    N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1320):115-7. PubMed ID: 20720613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Knowledge and beliefs on cervical cancer and practices on cervical cancer screening among women aged 20 to 50 years in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, 2012: a cross-sectional study.
    Sawadogo B; Gitta SN; Rutebemberwa E; Sawadogo M; Meda N
    Pan Afr Med J; 2014; 18():175. PubMed ID: 25419302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Implementing recommendations for the early detection of breast and cervical cancer among low-income women.
    Lawson HW; Henson R; Bobo JK; Kaeser MK
    MMWR Recomm Rep; 2000 Mar; 49(RR-2):37-55. PubMed ID: 15580731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Screening and early diagnosis of cervical cancer].
    Baldauf JJ; Fender M; Baulon E
    Rev Prat; 2010 Feb; 60(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 20225560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cervical cancer still presents symptomatically 20 years after the introduction of a structured national screening programme.
    Myriokefalitaki E; Potdar N; Barnfield L; Davies Q; Moss EL
    Cytopathology; 2016 Aug; 27(4):229-36. PubMed ID: 26919275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.