These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28954210)

  • 21. Assessment of condyle-coronoid angle and gonial angle for gender determination: A digital panoramic study in Bagalkot population.
    Ingaleshwar P; Bhosale S; Nimbulkar G; Smitha T; Deepak V; Britto F
    J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2022; 26(3):414-418. PubMed ID: 36588824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dilemma of gonial angle measurement: Panoramic radiograph or lateral cephalogram.
    Radhakrishnan PD; Sapna Varma NK; Ajith VV
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2017 Jun; 47(2):93-97. PubMed ID: 28680845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Agreement between panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs for measuring the gonial angle.
    Zangouei-Booshehri M; Aghili HA; Abasi M; Ezoddini-Ardakani F
    Iran J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 9(4):178-82. PubMed ID: 23407613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Forensic Gender Prediction by Using Mandibular Morphometric Indices: A Panoramic Radiograph Study.
    Arthanari A; Sureshbabu S; Ramalingam K; Prathap L; Ravindran V
    Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56603. PubMed ID: 38646405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of edentulousness on gonial angle, ramus and condylar height.
    Huumonen S; Sipilä K; Haikola B; Tapio M; Söderholm AL; Remes-Lyly T; Oikarinen K; Raustia AM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 19912483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns.
    Rodriguez-Cardenas YA; Arriola-Guillen LE; Flores-Mir C
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):46-53. PubMed ID: 25628079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of gonial angle in relation to age, gender, and dentition status by radiological and anthropometric methods.
    Upadhyay RB; Upadhyay J; Agrawal P; Rao NN
    J Forensic Dent Sci; 2012 Jan; 4(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 23087579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Radiographic evaluation of the mandible to predict age and sex in subadults.
    Ulusoy AT; Ozkara E
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2022 Aug; 80(6):419-426. PubMed ID: 35015609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Influence of the Mandibular Gonial Angle on the Incidence of Mandibular Angle Fracture-A Radiomorphometric Study.
    Panneerselvam E; Prasad PJ; Balasubramaniam S; Somasundaram S; Raja KV; Srinivasan D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 75(1):153-159. PubMed ID: 27643630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic validity of different gonial angle segmentation for the assessment of mandibular growth direction: A retrospective study.
    Mei H; Feng Q; Wu Y; Li X; Jiang F; Tian N; Li J
    Ann Anat; 2022 Jun; 242():151912. PubMed ID: 35183708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Panoramic radiographic evaluation of the mandibular morphological changes in elderly dentate and edentulous subjects.
    Joo JK; Lim YJ; Kwon HB; Ahn SJ
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Mar; 71(2):357-62. PubMed ID: 22774938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Age and gender correlation of gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects in a dental school in Far North Queensland.
    Leversha J; McKeough G; Myrteza A; Skjellrup-Wakefiled H; Welsh J; Sholapurkar A
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2016 Feb; 8(1):e49-54. PubMed ID: 26855706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimation of the gonial angle from the orthopantomogram.
    Niwa K; Maeda T; Omichi S; Sumikawa Y
    Gifu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Jun; 17(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 2134773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the gonial angle in the Anatolian populations: from past to present.
    Gungor K; Sagir M; Ozer I
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Jun; 31(2):375-8. PubMed ID: 17847912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Size of the mandibular jaw angle related to age, tooth retention and gender.
    Ohm E; Silness J
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Nov; 26(11):883-91. PubMed ID: 10583739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Morphological evaluation of gonial and antegonial regions in bruxers on panoramic radiographic images.
    Unal Erzurumlu Z; Sadik E; Gokkurt BN; Ozbey F; Erzurumlu K; Kasko Arici Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):457. PubMed ID: 37420199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relative position of the mandibular foramen in different age groups of children: a radiographic study.
    Poonacha KS; Shigli AL; Indushekar KR
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 21157049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sex estimation in Indians by digital analysis of the gonial angle on lateral cephalographs.
    Belaldavar C; Acharya AB; Angadi P
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2019 Sep; 37(2):45-50. PubMed ID: 31589595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the relationship between gonial angle and impacted mandibular third molar teeth.
    Demirel O; Akbulut A
    Anat Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 95(1):134-142. PubMed ID: 31701372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography for mandibular morphometry.
    Tassoker M; Akin D; Aydin Kabakci AD; Sener S
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2019; 78(4):862-870. PubMed ID: 30888681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.