167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28954988)
1. Construction of a combinatorial pipeline using two somatic variant calling methods for whole exome sequence data of gastric cancer.
Kohmoto T; Masuda K; Naruto T; Tange S; Shoda K; Hamada J; Saito M; Ichikawa D; Tajima A; Otsuji E; Imoto I
J Med Invest; 2017; 64(3.4):233-240. PubMed ID: 28954988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data.
Krøigård AB; Thomassen M; Lænkholm AV; Kruse TA; Larsen MJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151664. PubMed ID: 27002637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimized pipeline of MuTect and GATK tools to improve the detection of somatic single nucleotide polymorphisms in whole-exome sequencing data.
do Valle ÍF; Giampieri E; Simonetti G; Padella A; Manfrini M; Ferrari A; Papayannidis C; Zironi I; Garonzi M; Bernardi S; Delledonne M; Martinelli G; Remondini D; Castellani G
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Nov; 17(Suppl 12):341. PubMed ID: 28185561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and reproducibility of somatic point mutation calling in clinical-type targeted sequencing data.
Karimnezhad A; Palidwor GA; Thavorn K; Stewart DJ; Campbell PA; Lo B; Perkins TJ
BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Oct; 13(1):156. PubMed ID: 33059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A three-caller pipeline for variant analysis of cancer whole-exome sequencing data.
Liu ZK; Shang YK; Chen ZN; Bian H
Mol Med Rep; 2017 May; 15(5):2489-2494. PubMed ID: 28447726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intersect-then-combine approach: improving the performance of somatic variant calling in whole exome sequencing data using multiple aligners and callers.
Callari M; Sammut SJ; De Mattos-Arruda L; Bruna A; Rueda OM; Chin SF; Caldas C
Genome Med; 2017 Apr; 9(1):35. PubMed ID: 28420412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detailed simulation of cancer exome sequencing data reveals differences and common limitations of variant callers.
Hofmann AL; Behr J; Singer J; Kuipers J; Beisel C; Schraml P; Moch H; Beerenwinkel N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 28049408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of novel genes by whole-exome sequencing can improve gastric cancer precision oncology.
Lianos GD; Glantzounis GK; Bali CD; Katsios C; Roukos DH
Future Oncol; 2017 Apr; 13(10):883-892. PubMed ID: 27897040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SNVSniffer: an integrated caller for germline and somatic single-nucleotide and indel mutations.
Liu Y; Loewer M; Aluru S; Schmidt B
BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):47. PubMed ID: 27489955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic alterations and their clinical implications in gastric cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis revealed by whole-exome sequencing of malignant ascites.
Lim B; Kim C; Kim JH; Kwon WS; Lee WS; Kim JM; Park JY; Kim HS; Park KH; Kim TS; Park JL; Chung HC; Rha SY; Kim SY
Oncotarget; 2016 Feb; 7(7):8055-66. PubMed ID: 26811494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of somatic mutation calling methods in amplicon and whole exome sequence data.
Xu H; DiCarlo J; Satya RV; Peng Q; Wang Y
BMC Genomics; 2014 Mar; 15():244. PubMed ID: 24678773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accurate Ensemble Prediction of Somatic Mutations with SMuRF2.
Huang W; Sim NL; Skanderup AJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2493():53-66. PubMed ID: 35751808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Practicability of detecting somatic point mutation from RNA high throughput sequencing data.
Sheng Q; Zhao S; Li CI; Shyr Y; Guo Y
Genomics; 2016 May; 107(5):163-9. PubMed ID: 27046520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing an ion semiconductor sequencing data analysis method to identify somatic mutations in the genomes of cancer cells in clinical tissue samples.
Nagashima T; Shimoda Y; Tanabe T; Naruoka A; Saito J; Serizawa M; Ohshima K; Urakami K; Ohnami S; Ohnami S; Mochizuki T; Kusuhara M; Yamaguchi K
Biomed Res; 2016; 37(6):359-366. PubMed ID: 28003583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advances in computational approaches for prioritizing driver mutations and significantly mutated genes in cancer genomes.
Cheng F; Zhao J; Zhao Z
Brief Bioinform; 2016 Jul; 17(4):642-56. PubMed ID: 26307061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comprehensive benchmarking of SNV callers for highly admixed tumor data.
Bohnert R; Vivas S; Jansen G
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186175. PubMed ID: 29020110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detecting somatic point mutations in cancer genome sequencing data: a comparison of mutation callers.
Wang Q; Jia P; Li F; Chen H; Ji H; Hucks D; Dahlman KB; Pao W; Zhao Z
Genome Med; 2013; 5(10):91. PubMed ID: 24112718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Whole-exome sequencing to identify somatic mutations in peritoneal metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma: A preliminary study.
Liu H; Li F; Zhu Y; Li T; Huang H; Lin T; Hu Y; Qi X; Yu J; Li G
Oncotarget; 2016 Jul; 7(28):43894-43906. PubMed ID: 27270314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computational analysis in cancer exome sequencing.
Evans P; Kong Y; Krauthammer M
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1176():219-27. PubMed ID: 25030931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
