These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28956154)

  • 1. Sources of interference in cross-modal action: response selection, crosstalk, and general dual-execution costs.
    Pieczykolan A; Huestegge L
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):109-120. PubMed ID: 28956154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Backward crosstalk and the role of dimensional overlap within and between tasks.
    Huestegge L; Pieczykolan A; Janczyk M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():139-147. PubMed ID: 29933176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dual-task crosstalk between saccades and manual responses.
    Huestegge L; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 19331493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28578525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flexibility of individual multitasking strategies in task-switching with preview: are preferences for serial versus overlapping task processing dependent on between-task conflict?
    Brüning J; Manzey D
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):92-108. PubMed ID: 28983726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oculomotor dominance in multitasking: mechanisms of conflict resolution in cross-modal action.
    Pieczykolan A; Huestegge L
    J Vis; 2014 Nov; 14(13):18. PubMed ID: 25406163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shifting the set of stimulus selection when switching between tasks.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):134-145. PubMed ID: 28752317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring the repetition bias in voluntary task switching.
    Mittelstädt V; Dignath D; Schmidt-Ott M; Kiesel A
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 28871331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissociating action-effect activation and effect-based response selection.
    Schwarz KA; Pfister R; Wirth R; Kunde W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():16-24. PubMed ID: 29807302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of free-order and sequential-order instructions on task-order regulation in dual tasks.
    Kübler S; Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):40-53. PubMed ID: 28856434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Action control in task switching: do action effects modulate N - 2 repetition costs in task switching?
    Schuch S; Sommer A; Lukas S
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 29147794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Talking while looking: on the encapsulation of output system representations.
    Huestegge L; Pieczykolan A; Koch I
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Sep; 73():72-91. PubMed ID: 25003309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of saccades in multitasking: towards an output-related view of eye movements.
    Huestegge L
    Psychol Res; 2011 Nov; 75(6):452-65. PubMed ID: 21720887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response-code conflict in dual-task interference and its modulation by age.
    Paas Oliveros LK; Pieczykolan A; Pläschke RN; Eickhoff SB; Langner R
    Psychol Res; 2023 Feb; 87(1):260-280. PubMed ID: 35122495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stimulus-response incompatibility eliminates inhibitory cueing effects with saccadic but not manual responses.
    Eng V; Lim A; Kwon S; Gan SR; Jamaluddin SA; Janssen SMJ; Satel J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1097-1106. PubMed ID: 28229429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When two actions are easier than one: how inhibitory control demands affect response processing.
    Huestegge L; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():230-6. PubMed ID: 25086224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task switching, modality compatibility, and the supra-modal function of eye movements.
    Stephan DN; Koch I; Hendler J; Huestegge L
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 23047914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response modalities and the cognitive architecture underlying action control: Intra-modal trumps cross-modal action coordination.
    Weller L; Pieczykolan A; Huestegge L
    Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105115. PubMed ID: 35390694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dual-task automatization: The key role of sensory-motor modality compatibility.
    Maquestiaux F; Ruthruff E; Defer A; Ibrahime S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):752-772. PubMed ID: 29285603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.