These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

41 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28956682)

  • 1. Choice history biases subsequent evidence accumulation.
    Urai AE; de Gee JW; Tsetsos K; Donner TH
    Elife; 2019 Jul; 8():. PubMed ID: 31264959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. People learn other people's preferences through inverse decision-making.
    Jern A; Lucas CG; Kemp C
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():46-64. PubMed ID: 28662485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual uncertainty.
    Diamond ME
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Aug; 17(8):e3000430. PubMed ID: 31454344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spillover bias in social and nonsocial judgments of diversity and variability.
    Mijalli Y; Price PC; Navarro SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Oct; 30(5):1829-1839. PubMed ID: 36914912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decoupling Judgment and Decision Making: A Tale of Two Tails.
    Oral B; Dragicevic P; Telea A; Dimara E
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2023 Dec; PP():. PubMed ID: 38145516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Achieving More With Less: Intuitive Correction in Selection.
    Rabinovitch H; Bereby-Meyer Y; Budescu DV
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Apr; 31(4):437-448. PubMed ID: 32202973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. First is best.
    Carney DR; Banaji MR
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e35088. PubMed ID: 22761650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The less-is-better effect: a developmental perspective.
    Parrish AE; Sandgren EE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Dec; 30(6):2363-2370. PubMed ID: 37340112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preference-based serial decision dynamics: your first sushi reveals your eating order at the sushi table.
    Jeong J; Oh Y; Chun M; Kralik JD
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96653. PubMed ID: 24846274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Special Number or a Mere Numerical Array? Effect of Repdigits on Judgments and Choices.
    Honda H; Matsunaga S; Ueda K
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1551. PubMed ID: 32765354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Joy Leads to Overconfidence, and a Simple Countermeasure.
    Koellinger P; Treffers T
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143263. PubMed ID: 26678704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Humans actively sample evidence to support prior beliefs.
    Kaanders P; Sepulveda P; Folke T; Ortoleva P; De Martino B
    Elife; 2022 Apr; 11():. PubMed ID: 35404234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Valuations of target items are drawn towards unavailable decoy items due to prior expectations.
    Izakson L; Yoo M; Hakim A; Krajbich I; Webb R; Levy DJ
    PNAS Nexus; 2024 Jul; 3(7):pgae232. PubMed ID: 38948017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of task structure and confirmation bias in alternative hypotheses evaluation.
    Dhami MK; Belton IK; De Werd P; Hadzhieva V; Wicke L
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Jun; 9(1):37. PubMed ID: 38866984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wisdom lies in applying critical clinical judgment that delves deeper than mere appearances. Apropos of a case of ventricular hypertrophy.
    Ripoll-Vera T
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2023 Dec; 76(12):952-953. PubMed ID: 37572773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Focusing on Decisions, Outcomes, and Value Judgments to Confront Algorithmic Bias.
    Pandya A; Zhu J
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jun; 6(6):e2318501. PubMed ID: 37318809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. War Handkerchiefs.
    Indep Pract; 1882 Jun; 3(6):426-427. PubMed ID: 37825727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Final Sampling Bias in Haptic Judgments: How Final Touch Affects Decision-Making.
    Mitsuda T; Yoshioka Y
    Perception; 2018 Jan; 47(1):90-104. PubMed ID: 28956682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Taken last, selected first: the sampling bias is also present in the haptic domain.
    Mitsuda T; Yoshioka Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):941-7. PubMed ID: 25465397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.