184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28956715)
1. Measuring Limb Volume: Accuracy and Reliability of Tape Measurement Versus Perometer Measurement.
Sharkey AR; King SW; Kuo RY; Bickerton SB; Ramsden AJ; Furniss D
Lymphat Res Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):182-186. PubMed ID: 28956715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of lower limb volume: agreement between the vertically oriented perometer and a tape measure method.
Tan CW; Coutts F; Bulley C
Physiotherapy; 2013 Sep; 99(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 23351956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of an optoelectronic limb volumeter (Perometer).
Stanton AW; Northfield JW; Holroyd B; Mortimer PS; Levick JR
Lymphology; 1997 Jun; 30(2):77-97. PubMed ID: 9215977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative comparison between the laser scanner three-dimensional method and the circumferential method for evaluation of arm volume in patients with lymphedema.
Cau N; Galli M; Cimolin V; Grossi A; Battarin I; Puleo G; Balzarini A; Caraceni A
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2018 Jan; 6(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 29248110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study between mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer and two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema of the arm.
Adriaenssens N; Buyl R; Lievens P; Fontaine C; Lamote J
Lymphology; 2013 Sep; 46(3):132-43. PubMed ID: 24645536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and concurrent validity of the perometer for measuring hand volume in women with and without lymphedema.
Lee MJ; Boland RA; Czerniec S; Kilbreath SL
Lymphat Res Biol; 2011 Mar; 9(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 21417763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Self-measurement of upper extremity volume in women post-breast cancer: reliability and validity study.
Mori T; Lustman A; Katz-Leurer M
Physiother Theory Pract; 2015 May; 31(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 25539094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study between circumferential method and laser scanner 3D method for the evaluation of arm volume in healthy subjects.
Cau N; Galli M; Cimolin V; Aranci M; Caraceni A; Balzarini A
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2016 Jan; 4(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 26946898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement Properties of Instruments for Measuring of Lymphedema: Systematic Review.
Hidding JT; Viehoff PB; Beurskens CH; van Laarhoven HW; Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW; van der Wees PJ
Phys Ther; 2016 Dec; 96(12):1965-1981. PubMed ID: 27340195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter-observer and Intra-observer Variability in Volume Measurements of the Lower Extremity Using Perometer.
Reza C; Nørregaard S; Moffatt C; Karlsmark T
Lymphat Res Biol; 2020 Oct; 18(5):416-421. PubMed ID: 32159446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Precision and reliability of tape measurements in the assessment of head and neck lymphedema.
Chotipanich A; Kongpit N
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233395. PubMed ID: 32421740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema.
Meijer RS; Rietman JS; Geertzen JH; Bosmans JC; Dijkstra PU
Lymphology; 2004 Sep; 37(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 15560108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Infrared optoelectronic volumetry, the ideal way to measure limb volume.
Tierney S; Aslam M; Rennie K; Grace P
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1996 Nov; 12(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 8980428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema.
Taylor R; Jayasinghe UW; Koelmeyer L; Ung O; Boyages J
Phys Ther; 2006 Feb; 86(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 16445334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing Arm Volume in People During and After Treatment for Breast Cancer: Reliability and Convergent Validity of the LymphaTech System.
Binkley JM; Weiler MJ; Frank N; Bober L; Dixon JB; Stratford PW
Phys Ther; 2020 Mar; 100(3):457-467. PubMed ID: 32043125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema.
Ridner SH; Montgomery LD; Hepworth JT; Stewart BR; Armer JM
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17539463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema--comparison of physical measurement methods and self-report.
Czerniec SA; Ward LC; Refshauge KM; Beith J; Lee MJ; York S; Kilbreath SL
Cancer Invest; 2010 Jan; 28(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19916749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter-rater reliability of arm circumference measurement.
Foroughi N; Dylke ES; Paterson RD; Sparrow KA; Fan J; Warwick EB; Kilbreath SL
Lymphat Res Biol; 2011; 9(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 21688979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity and reliability of three-dimensional imaging for measuring the volume of the arm.
Erends M; van der Aa T; de Grzymala AP; van der Hulst R
Lymphat Res Biol; 2014 Dec; 12(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 25495383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a Novel Water-Based Volumetric Device for Measuring Upper Limb Lymphedema: First Experience with Healthy Volunteers.
Wolfs JAGN; Bijkerk E; Schols RM; Keuter XHA; van der Hulst RRWJ; Qiu SS
Lymphat Res Biol; 2019 Aug; 17(4):434-439. PubMed ID: 30653398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
