These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28957698)

  • 1. New era / new solutions: The role of alternative tariff structures in water supply projects.
    Pinto FS; Marques RC
    Water Res; 2017 Dec; 126():216-231. PubMed ID: 28957698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Urban water tariff structure and cost recovery opportunities in India.
    Singh MR; Upadhyay V; Mittal AK
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(12):43-51. PubMed ID: 16477970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Water pricing in England and Wales--institutions and objectives.
    Day G
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(6):33-41. PubMed ID: 12731769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Levers supporting tariff growth for water services: evidence from a contingent valuation analysis.
    Guerrini A; Vigolo V; Romano G; Testa F
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Feb; 207():23-31. PubMed ID: 29154005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sustainability assessments of regional water supply interventions - Combining cost-benefit and multi-criteria decision analyses.
    Sjöstrand K; Lindhe A; Söderqvist T; Rosén L
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Nov; 225():313-324. PubMed ID: 30099146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The difference between energy consumption and energy cost: Modelling energy tariff structures for water resource recovery facilities.
    Aymerich I; Rieger L; Sobhani R; Rosso D; Corominas L
    Water Res; 2015 Sep; 81():113-23. PubMed ID: 26048700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating a novel tiered scarcity adjusted water budget and pricing structure using a holistic systems modelling approach.
    Sahin O; Bertone E; Beal C; Stewart RA
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jun; 215():79-90. PubMed ID: 29567555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ASTA - A method for multi-criteria evaluation of water supply technologies to Assess the most SusTainable Alternative for Copenhagen.
    Godskesen B; Hauschild M; Albrechtsen HJ; Rygaard M
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Mar; 618():399-408. PubMed ID: 29132007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Desalination and sustainability - An appraisal and current perspective.
    Gude VG
    Water Res; 2016 Feb; 89():87-106. PubMed ID: 26641014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sources of uncertainty in economic analysis of the Water Framework Directive.
    Mysiak J; Sigel K
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):161-6. PubMed ID: 16304948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Participatory environmental governance in China: public hearings on urban water tariff setting.
    Zhong LJ; Mol AP
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Sep; 88(4):899-913. PubMed ID: 17573184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incentive pricing and cost recovery at the basin scale.
    Ward FA; Pulido-Velazquez M
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):293-313. PubMed ID: 18241978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring water affordability in developed economies. The added value of a needs-based approach.
    Vanhille J; Goedemé T; Penne T; Van Thielen L; Storms B
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jul; 217():611-620. PubMed ID: 29649733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Affordability of residential water tariffs: alternative measurement and explanatory factors in southern Spain.
    García-Valiñas MA; Martínez-Espiñeira R; González-Gómez F
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Dec; 91(12):2696-706. PubMed ID: 20709443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A distance-based uncertainty analysis approach to multi-criteria decision analysis for water resource decision making.
    Hyde KM; Maier HR; Colby CB
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Dec; 77(4):278-90. PubMed ID: 16288957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A stochastic optimization approach for integrated urban water resource planning.
    Huang Y; Chen J; Zeng S; Sun F; Dong X
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(7):1634-41. PubMed ID: 23552255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. System dynamics modeling for municipal water demand estimation in an urban region under uncertain economic impacts.
    Qi C; Chang NB
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Jun; 92(6):1628-41. PubMed ID: 21324581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The timing and probability of treatment switch under cost uncertainty: an application to patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
    de Mello-Sampayo F
    Value Health; 2014 Mar; 17(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 24636379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A mixed-methods approach to strategic planning for multi-benefit regional water infrastructure.
    Harris-Lovett S; Lienert J; Sedlak D
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Mar; 233():218-237. PubMed ID: 30580118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inexact multistage stochastic integer programming for water resources management under uncertainty.
    Li YP; Huang GH; Nie SL; Liu L
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Jul; 88(1):93-107. PubMed ID: 17532113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.