These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28957732)

  • 1. When perception trips action! The increase in the perceived size of both hand and target matters in reaching and grasping movements.
    Ambron E; Schettino LF; Coyle M; Jax S; Coslett HB
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():160-168. PubMed ID: 28957732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of visual feedback from the recent past on the programming of grip aperture is grasp-specific, shared between hands, and mediated by sensorimotor memory not task set.
    Tang R; Whitwell RL; Goodale MA
    Cognition; 2015 May; 138():49-63. PubMed ID: 25704582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reaching and grasping actions and their context shape the perception of object size.
    Bosco A; Daniele F; Fattori P
    J Vis; 2017 Oct; 17(12):10. PubMed ID: 29053780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proprioceptive Distance Cues Restore Perfect Size Constancy in Grasping, but Not Perception, When Vision Is Limited.
    Chen J; Sperandio I; Goodale MA
    Curr Biol; 2018 Mar; 28(6):927-932.e4. PubMed ID: 29502946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The continuous updating of grasp in response to dynamic changes in object size, hand size and distractor proximity.
    Karok S; Newport R
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Nov; 48(13):3891-900. PubMed ID: 20933527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of vision in aperture closure control during reach-to-grasp movements.
    Rand MK; Lemay M; Squire LM; Shimansky YP; Stelmach GE
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(3):447-60. PubMed ID: 17476491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Horizontal target size perturbations during grasping movements are described by subsequent size perception and saccade amplitude.
    Sanz Diez P; Bosco A; Fattori P; Wahl S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0264560. PubMed ID: 35290373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No dissociation between perception and action in patient DF when haptic feedback is withdrawn.
    Schenk T
    J Neurosci; 2012 Feb; 32(6):2013-7. PubMed ID: 22323715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grasping Weber's illusion: the effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching.
    Anema HA; Wolswijk VW; Ruis C; Dijkerman HC
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):951-67. PubMed ID: 19378413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the reach-to-grasp movement between children and adults: a kinematic study.
    Zoia S; Pezzetta E; Blason L; Scabar A; Carrozzi M; Bulgheroni M; Castiello U
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2006; 30(2):719-38. PubMed ID: 16995833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grasping without vision: time normalizing grip aperture profiles yields spurious grip scaling to target size.
    Whitwell RL; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(10):1878-87. PubMed ID: 23796704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative size of numerical magnitude induces a size-contrast effect on the grip scaling of reach-to-grasp movements.
    Chiou RY; Wu DH; Tzeng OJ; Hung DL; Chang EC
    Cortex; 2012 Sep; 48(8):1043-51. PubMed ID: 21889134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Programming of left hand exploits task set but that of right hand depends on recent history.
    Tang R; Zhu H
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jul; 235(7):2215-2224. PubMed ID: 28451736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gender differences in non-standard mapping tasks: A kinematic study using pantomimed reach-to-grasp actions.
    Copley-Mills J; Connolly JD; Cavina-Pratesi C
    Cortex; 2016 Sep; 82():244-254. PubMed ID: 27410715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Getting a grip on reality: Grasping movements directed to real objects and images rely on dissociable neural representations.
    Freud E; Macdonald SN; Chen J; Quinlan DJ; Goodale MA; Culham JC
    Cortex; 2018 Jan; 98():34-48. PubMed ID: 28431740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of visual constraints in the trajectory formation of grasping movements.
    Palluel-Germain R; Boy F; Orliaguet JP; Coello Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jun; 401(1-2):97-102. PubMed ID: 16556486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monocular vision leads to a dissociation between grip force and grip aperture scaling during reach-to-grasp movements.
    Jackson SR; Newport R; Shaw A
    Curr Biol; 2002 Feb; 12(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 11839278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does grasping in patient D.F. depend on vision?
    Milner AD; Ganel T; Goodale MA
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2012 May; 16(5):256-7; discussion 258-9. PubMed ID: 22425666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Haptic grasping configurations in early infancy reveal different developmental profiles for visual guidance of the Reach versus the Grasp.
    Karl JM; Whishaw IQ
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 232(10):3301-16. PubMed ID: 24969613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual information about object size and object position are retained differently in the visual brain: Evidence from grasping studies.
    Hesse C; Miller L; Buckingham G
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():531-543. PubMed ID: 27663865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.