These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28958427)

  • 1. Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.
    Körber M; Baseler E; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 28958427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why Do I Have to Drive Now? Post Hoc Explanations of Takeover Requests.
    Körber M; Prasch L; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2018 May; 60(3):305-323. PubMed ID: 29283269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving.
    Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Vilimek R; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):509-19. PubMed ID: 26843570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age-related differences in effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover performance in automated driving.
    Wu Y; Kihara K; Hasegawa K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():231-238. PubMed ID: 32199568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of an Additional Task During Level 2 Automated Driving: An On-Road Study Comparing Drivers With and Without Experience With Partial Automation.
    Solís-Marcos I; Ahlström C; Kircher K
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):778-792. PubMed ID: 29791201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
    Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceived safety and trust in SAE Level 2 partially automated cars: Results from an online questionnaire.
    Nordhoff S; Stapel J; He X; Gentner A; Happee R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260953. PubMed ID: 34932565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What happens when drivers of automated vehicles take over control in critical brake situations?
    Roche F; Thüring M; Trukenbrod AK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105588. PubMed ID: 32531374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 May; 78():212-221. PubMed ID: 25794922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is partially automated driving a bad idea? Observations from an on-road study.
    Banks VA; Eriksson A; O'Donoghue J; Stanton NA
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Apr; 68():138-145. PubMed ID: 29409628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behavioral Changes to Repeated Takeovers in Highly Automated Driving: Effects of the Takeover-Request Design and the Nondriving-Related Task Modality.
    Roche F; Somieski A; Brandenburg S
    Hum Factors; 2019 Aug; 61(5):839-849. PubMed ID: 30517032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment selection in human-automation interaction studies: The Failure-GAM
    Grane C
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():182-192. PubMed ID: 28865841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Driver compliance to take-over requests with different auditory outputs in conditional automation.
    Forster Y; Naujoks F; Neukum A; Huestegge L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Dec; 109():18-28. PubMed ID: 28992451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coming back into the loop: Drivers' perceptual-motor performance in critical events after automated driving.
    Louw T; Markkula G; Boer E; Madigan R; Carsten O; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():9-18. PubMed ID: 28837837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noncritical State Transitions During Conditionally Automated Driving on German Freeways: Effects of Non-Driving Related Tasks on Takeover Time and Takeover Quality.
    Naujoks F; Purucker C; Wiedemann K; Marberger C
    Hum Factors; 2019 Jun; 61(4):596-613. PubMed ID: 30689440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Taking Over Control From Highly Automated Vehicles in Complex Traffic Situations: The Role of Traffic Density.
    Gold C; Körber M; Lechner D; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2016 Jun; 58(4):642-52. PubMed ID: 26984515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Challenges to Human Drivers in Increasingly Automated Vehicles.
    Hancock PA; Kajaks T; Caird JK; Chignell MH; Mizobuchi S; Burns PC; Feng J; Fernie GR; Lavallière M; Noy IY; Redelmeier DA; Vrkljan BH
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):310-328. PubMed ID: 32022583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Behavioral Adaptations to Lane Keeping Systems: Effects of Exposure and Withdrawal.
    Miller EE; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):152-164. PubMed ID: 30235014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.