These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28958910)

  • 21. Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 117(11):2532-9. PubMed ID: 17005448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electrophysiological evidence for endogenous control of attention in switching between languages in overt picture naming.
    Verhoef KM; Roelofs A; Chwilla DJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1832-43. PubMed ID: 19580393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is P3 a strategic or a tactical component? Relationships of P3 sub-components to response times in oddball tasks with go, no-go and choice responses.
    Verleger R; Grauhan N; Śmigasiewicz K
    Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():223-234. PubMed ID: 27570107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Voluntary stimulus production enhances deviance processing in the brain.
    Nittono H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16257077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Level of interest in video clips modulates event-related potentials to auditory probes.
    Suzuki J; Nittono H; Hori T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Jan; 55(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 15598514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of reaction time in continuous performance tasks as an index of attention by electrophysiological measures.
    Reinvang I
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1998 Dec; 20(6):885-97. PubMed ID: 10484699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attention demands of language production in adults who stutter.
    Maxfield ND; Olsen WL; Kleinman D; Frisch SA; Ferreira VS; Lister JJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Apr; 127(4):1942-60. PubMed ID: 26971476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attentional switching in intellectually gifted and average children: effects on performance and ERP.
    Duan X; Shi J
    Psychol Rep; 2014 Apr; 114(2):597-607. PubMed ID: 24897910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. CNV resolution does not cause NoGo anteriorisation of the P3: a failure to replicate Simson et al.
    Smith JL; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 23669175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Age-related differences in novelty and target processing among cognitively high performing adults.
    Daffner KR; Ryan KK; Williams DM; Budson AE; Rentz DM; Scinto LF; Holcomb PJ
    Neurobiol Aging; 2005 Oct; 26(9):1283-95. PubMed ID: 16054727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Task complexity and habituation effects on frontal P300 topography.
    Wintink AJ; Segalowitz SJ; Cudmore LJ
    Brain Cogn; 2001; 46(1-2):307-11. PubMed ID: 11527356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attentional processes in children with ADHD: an event-related potential study using the attention network test.
    Kratz O; Studer P; Malcherek S; Erbe K; Moll GH; Heinrich H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Aug; 81(2):82-90. PubMed ID: 21641942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Approach of visual stimuli modulates spatial expectations for subsequent somatosensory stimuli.
    Kimura T; Katayama J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jun; 96(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 25889695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of task complexity in young and old adults: reaction time and P300 latency are not always dissociated.
    Smulders FT; Kenemans JL; Schmidt WF; Kok A
    Psychophysiology; 1999 Jan; 36(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 10098387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3.
    Goldstein A; Spencer KM; Donchin E
    Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 12462506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Single-trial P3 amplitude and latency informed event-related fMRI models yield different BOLD response patterns to a target detection task.
    Warbrick T; Mobascher A; Brinkmeyer J; Musso F; Richter N; Stoecker T; Fink GR; Shah NJ; Winterer G
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 47(4):1532-44. PubMed ID: 19505583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differences in Cortical Sources of the Event-Related P3 Potential Between Young and Old Participants Indicate Frontal Compensation.
    van Dinteren R; Huster RJ; Jongsma MLA; Kessels RPC; Arns M
    Brain Topogr; 2018 Jan; 31(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 28101703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Teasing apart the anticipatory and consummatory processing of monetary incentives: An event-related potential study of reward dynamics.
    Novak KD; Foti D
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1470-82. PubMed ID: 26223291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effects of covert attention and stimulus complexity on the P3 response during an auditory continuous performance task.
    Shucard DW; Abara JP; McCabe DC; Benedict RB; Shucard JL
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Nov; 54(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 15331213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.