151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28958952)
1. Individual sperm selection by microfluidics integrated with interferometric phase microscopy.
Eravuchira PJ; Mirsky SK; Barnea I; Levi M; Balberg M; Shaked NT
Methods; 2018 Mar; 136():152-159. PubMed ID: 28958952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated analysis of individual sperm cells using stain-free interferometric phase microscopy and machine learning.
Mirsky SK; Barnea I; Levi M; Greenspan H; Shaked NT
Cytometry A; 2017 Sep; 91(9):893-900. PubMed ID: 28834185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interferometric phase microscopy for label-free morphological evaluation of sperm cells.
Haifler M; Girshovitz P; Band G; Dardikman G; Madjar I; Shaked NT
Fertil Steril; 2015 Jul; 104(1):43-7.e2. PubMed ID: 26003272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Emerging trends in sperm selection: enhancing success rates in assisted reproduction.
Zhang X; Chao S; Ye N; Ouyang D
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2024 Jun; 22(1):67. PubMed ID: 38877490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sperm selection methods in the 21st century.
Vaughan DA; Sakkas D
Biol Reprod; 2019 Dec; 101(6):1076-1082. PubMed ID: 30801632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sperm Selection for ICSI: Do We Have a Winner?
Baldini D; Ferri D; Baldini GM; Lot D; Catino A; Vizziello D; Vizziello G
Cells; 2021 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 34944074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving ICSI: A review from the spermatozoon perspective.
Simopoulou M; Gkoles L; Bakas P; Giannelou P; Kalampokas T; Pantos K; Koutsilieris M
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2016 Dec; 62(6):359-371. PubMed ID: 27646677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Application of microfluidics in sperm isolation and in vitro fertilization].
Li FF; Wang XY; Zhou SM; You F
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 May; 20(5):452-9. PubMed ID: 24908739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stain-free interferometric phase microscopy correlation with DNA fragmentation stain in human spermatozoa.
Barnea I; Karako L; Mirsky SK; Levi M; Balberg M; Shaked NT
J Biophotonics; 2018 Nov; 11(11):e201800137. PubMed ID: 29877620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of human sperm chromatin status after selection using a modified Diff-Quik stain indicates embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization.
Tavares RS; Silva AF; Lourenço B; Almeida-Santos T; Sousa AP; Ramalho-Santos J
Andrology; 2013 Nov; 1(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 24124136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FertDish: microfluidic sperm selection-in-a-dish for intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Xiao S; Riordon J; Simchi M; Lagunov A; Hannam T; Jarvi K; Nosrati R; Sinton D
Lab Chip; 2021 Feb; 21(4):775-783. PubMed ID: 33507191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A microfluidic device to reduce treatment time of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Matsuura K; Uozumi T; Furuichi T; Sugimoto I; Kodama M; Funahashi H
Fertil Steril; 2013 Feb; 99(2):400-7. PubMed ID: 23122951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimizing TESE-ICSI by laser-assisted selection of immotile spermatozoa and polarization microscopy for selection of oocytes.
Nordhoff V; Schüring AN; Krallmann C; Zitzmann M; Schlatt S; Kiesel L; Kliesch S
Andrology; 2013 Jan; 1(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 23258632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sperm Inspection for In Vitro Fertilization via Self-Assembled Microdroplet Formation and Quantitative Phase Microscopy.
Atzitz Y; Dudaie M; Barnea I; Shaked NT
Cells; 2021 Nov; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 34943823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of the female reproductive tract and sperm features on the design of microfluidic sperm-sorting devices.
Ahmadkhani N; Hosseini M; Saadatmand M; Abbaspourrad A
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2022 Jan; 39(1):19-36. PubMed ID: 35034216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of microfluidic technologies to human assisted reproduction.
Smith GD; Takayama S
Mol Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 23(4):257-268. PubMed ID: 28130394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anti-sperm antibody levels are not related to fertilization or pregnancy rates after IVF or IVF/ICSI.
Zini A; Lefebvre J; Kornitzer G; Bissonnette F; Kadoch IJ; Dean N; Phillips S
J Reprod Immunol; 2011 Jan; 88(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 21111486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-magnification selection of spermatozoa prior to oocyte injection: confirmed and potential indications.
Boitrelle F; Guthauser B; Alter L; Bailly M; Bergere M; Wainer R; Vialard F; Albert M; Selva J
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Jan; 28(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 24268730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of paternal chromosomes and sperm morphology on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Raja K; Franken DR
Andrologia; 2006 Oct; 38(5):179-85. PubMed ID: 16961571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) vs intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients with repeated ICSI failure].
González-Ortega C; Cancino-Villarreal P; Pérez-Torres A; Vargas-Maciel MA; Martínez-Garza SG; Pérez-Peña E; Gutiérrez-Gutiédrrez AM
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2010 Dec; 78(12):652-9. PubMed ID: 21961371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
