These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28959744)

  • 1. Gingival Retraction Methods for Fabrication of Fixed Partial Denture: Literature Review.
    S S; Ma VS; Mi VS; F HG; M H
    J Dent Biomater; 2016 Jun; 3(2):205-213. PubMed ID: 28959744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gingival retraction techniques for implants versus teeth: current status.
    Bennani V; Schwass D; Chandler N
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Oct; 139(10):1354-63. PubMed ID: 18832271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gingival displacement using diode laser or retraction cords: A comparative clinical study.
    Melilli D; Mauceri R; Albanese A; Matranga D; Pizzo G
    Am J Dent; 2018 Jun; 31(3):131-134. PubMed ID: 30028930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quick, painless, and atraumatic gingival retraction: An overview of advanced materials.
    Rajambigai MA; Raja SR; Soundar SI; Kandasamy M
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2016 Oct; 8(Suppl 1):S5-S7. PubMed ID: 27829736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M
    J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new gingival retraction impression system for a one-stage root-form implant.
    Jones JD; Kaiser DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Sep; 80(3):371-3. PubMed ID: 9760372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of three noninvasive gingival displacement systems: An
    Thimmappa M; Bhatia M; Somani P; Kumar DRV
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(2):122-130. PubMed ID: 29692565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of different restorative and abutment materials on marginal and internal adaptation of three-unit cantilever implant-supported fixed partial dentures: an in vitro study.
    Kahramanoğlu E; Kulak-Özkan Y
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):608-17. PubMed ID: 23725094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New Zealand dentists' use of gingival retraction techniques for fixed prosthodontics and implants.
    Al-Ani A; Bennani V; Chandler NP; Lyons KM; Thomson WM
    N Z Dent J; 2010 Sep; 106(3):92-6. PubMed ID: 20882737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro assessment of the marginal and internal fits of interim implant restorations fabricated with different methods.
    Park JY; Jeong ID; Lee JJ; Bae SY; Kim JH; Kim WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):536-542. PubMed ID: 27174406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
    Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of two gingival retraction systems on lateral gingival displacement: A prospective clinical study.
    Anupam P; Namratha N; Vibha S; Anandakrishna GN; Shally K; Singh A
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2013; 3(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 25737887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.
    Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The profile prosthesis: an aesthetic fixed implant-supported restoration for the resorbed maxilla.
    Schnitman PA
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1999; 11(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 10218059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
    Wise M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement materials for efficacy in tissue management and dimensional accuracy.
    Gajbhiye V; Banerjee R; Jaiswal P; Chandak A; Radke U
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):173-179. PubMed ID: 31040552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A technique to record the gingival configuration of an interim implant-supported fixed partial denture.
    Yiqing H; Yuting H; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):495-497. PubMed ID: 29703668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system--a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth.
    Beier US; Kranewitter R; Dumfahrt H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 19418859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Access to the intracrevicular space in preparations for fixed prosthesis].
    Porzier J; Benner-Jordan L; Bourdeau B; Losfeld R
    Cah Prothese; 1991 Mar; (73):6-20. PubMed ID: 2013007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effect of provisional restoration on shaping the contour of the soft tissue during maxillary single tooth implant procedure].
    Di P; Lin Y; Luo J; Cui HY; Yu HY; Ren SX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Feb; 44(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 22353902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.