148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28960658)
1. Effects of Gingival Retraction Paste and Subsequent Cleaning with Hydrogen Peroxide on the Polymerization of Three Elastomeric Impression Materials: An In Vitro Study.
Abduljabbar TS; Al Amri MD; Al Rifaiy MQ; Al-Sowygh ZH; Vohra FA; Balous MA; Alqarni AS; Alotaibi AO
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jul; 28(6):709-714. PubMed ID: 28960658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of contemporary retraction agents and cleaning with hydrogen peroxide on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials.
Vohra F; Altokhais F; Thafrah AB; Alsaif K; Alyahya A; Alsahhaf A; AlFawaz YF; Aali KA; Abduljabbar T; Aldeeb M
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2020; 18():2280800019891072. PubMed ID: 31986959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of various interim fixed prosthodontic materials on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials.
Al-Sowygh ZH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24559525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional Change of Elastomeric Impression Materials During the First 24 Hours: A Pilot Study.
Roberts H
Oper Dent; 2021 Nov; 46(6):E307-E316. PubMed ID: 34919709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of conventional and experimental gingival retraction solutions on the tensile strength and inhibition of polymerization of four types of impression materials.
Sábio S; Franciscone PA; Mondelli J
J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 19089261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Polymerization time compatibility index of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials with conventional and experimental gingival margin displacement agents.
Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 24461950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.
Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temperature effects on the rheological properties of current polyether and polysiloxane impression materials during setting.
Berg JC; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Adán-Plaza S
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 12886208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Study of Dimensional Stability and Detail Reproduction of Reformulated and Nonreformulated Elastomeric Impression Materials.
Aivatzidou K; Kamalakidis SN; Emmanouil I; Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL
J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr; 30(4):345-350. PubMed ID: 32875682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinically relevant mechanical properties of elastomeric impression materials.
Chai J; Takahashi Y; Lautenschlager EP
Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 9728115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of temperature changes on the dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impression materials.
Corso M; Abanomy A; Di Canzio J; Zurakowski D; Morgano SM
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jun; 79(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 9627890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Indirect latex glove contamination and its inhibitory effect on vinyl polysiloxane polymerization.
Kimoto K; Tanaka K; Toyoda M; Ochiai KT
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 15867752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of surface moisture on detail reproduction of elastomeric impressions.
Johnson GH; Lepe X; Aw TC
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):354-64. PubMed ID: 14564290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under different conditions.
Katyayan PA; Kalavathy N; Katyayan M
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):881-2. PubMed ID: 22484900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of pressure generated by cordless gingival displacement materials.
Bennani V; Inger M; Aarts JM
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 24529659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of a new ring-opening metathesis elastomeric dental impression material with spray and immersion disinfection.
Kronström MH; Johnson GH; Hompesch RW
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20105678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation of impression removal force with elastomeric impression material rigidity and hardness.
Walker MP; Alderman N; Petrie CS; Melander J; McGuire J
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 23387301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
