These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28960658)

  • 21. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
    Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials.
    Wadhwani CP; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Setting Time of Polyether Impression Materials after Contact with Conventional and Experimental Gingival Margin Displacement Agents.
    Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Ziętek M; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 27333590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of defects in surface detail for monophase, 2-phase, and 3-phase impression techniques: an in vitro study.
    Varvara G; Murmura G; Sinjari B; Cardelli P; Caputi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 25438741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interaction of gloves and rubber dam with a poly(vinyl siloxane) impression material: a screening test.
    Kahn RL; Donovan TE; Chee WW
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(4):342-6. PubMed ID: 2638846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of material waste, dimensional stability, and detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials mixed with different mixing tips.
    Maluly-Proni AT; Delben JA; Briso ALF; Marson FC; Dos Santos PH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):759-764. PubMed ID: 33454110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of sulfur-based hemostatic agents and gingival retraction cords handled with latex gloves on the polymerization of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Machado CE; Guedes CG
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(6):628-33. PubMed ID: 22230998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Correlation of pressure and displacement during gingival displacement: An in vitro study.
    Bennani V; Aarts JM; Schumayer D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 26548889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials.
    Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):552-4. PubMed ID: 21209992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. 3D evaluation of the effect of disinfectants on dimensional accuracy and stability of two elastomeric impression materials.
    Soganci G; Cinar D; Caglar A; Yagiz A
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Jul; 37(4):675-684. PubMed ID: 29848853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Disinfection of bacterially contaminated hydrophilic PVS impression materials.
    Estafanous EW; Palenik CJ; Platt JA
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jan; 21(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 22040354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A clinical study on the effects of cordless and conventional retraction techniques on the gingival and periodontal health.
    Al Hamad KQ; Azar WZ; Alwaeli HA; Said KN
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Dec; 35(12):1053-8. PubMed ID: 19040582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of pressure generated by cordless gingival displacement techniques.
    Bennani V; Aarts JM; He LH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):388-92. PubMed ID: 22633595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials.
    Buzayan M; Baig MR; Yunus N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 24278919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
    Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Effect of different kinds of gingival retraction agents on the polymerization inhibition of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials].
    Hou QQ; Ge H; Gao YM
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2023 Jun; 32(3):251-254. PubMed ID: 37803978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
    Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Vinylsiloxanether: a new impression material. Clinical study of implant impressions with vinylsiloxanether versus polyether materials.
    Enkling N; Bayer S; Jöhren P; Mericske-Stern R
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 19793332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Influence of Nitrile Gloves on the Setting Behavior of Polyvinyl Siloxane Putty Impression Materials.
    Delgado AJ; Amaya-Pajares SP; Su Y; Behar-Horenstein L; Donovan TE
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 29469997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.