These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28960818)

  • 1. Biomechanical Stability Analysis of a Stand-alone Cage, Static and Rotational-dynamic Plate in a Two-level Cervical Fusion Construct.
    Tsitsopoulos PP; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Carandang G; Havey RM; Ghanayem AJ; Patwardhan AG
    Orthop Surg; 2017 Aug; 9(3):290-295. PubMed ID: 28960818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.
    Stein MI; Nayak AN; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
    Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices.
    Scholz M; Reyes PM; Schleicher P; Sawa AG; Baek S; Kandziora F; Marciano FF; Crawford NR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19139665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone interbody fusion cages in the cervical spine.
    Shimamoto N; Cunningham BW; Dmitriev AE; Minami A; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Oct; 26(19):E432-6. PubMed ID: 11698902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level anterior discectomy and a one-level corpectomy, combined with fusion and anterior plate reconstruction in the cervical spine.
    Aghayev K; Doulgeris JJ; Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Eleraky M; Lee WE; Vrionis FD
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Jan; 29(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 24239024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical analysis of an interbody cage with three integrated cancellous lag screws in a two-level cervical spine fusion construct: an in vitro study.
    Nayak AN; Stein MI; James CR; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Adu-Lartey M; Castellvi AE; Santoni BG
    Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):3002-10. PubMed ID: 24948039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical evaluation of a low-profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device at the index level or adjacent to plated fusion.
    Balaram AK; Ghanayem AJ; OʼLeary PT; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(13):E763-9. PubMed ID: 24732831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation.
    Setzer M; Eleraky M; Johnson WM; Aghayev K; Tran ND; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
    Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Zero-profile hybrid fusion construct versus 2-level plate fixation to treat adjacent-level disease in the cervical spine.
    Healy AT; Sundar SJ; Cardenas RJ; Mageswaran P; Benzel EC; Mroz TE; Francis TB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Nov; 21(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 25170655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of cervical zero profile integrated cage with and without supplemental posterior Interfacet stabilization.
    Havey RM; Blank KR; Khayatzadeh S; Muriuki MG; Pappu S; Patwardhan AG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Aug; 78():105078. PubMed ID: 32585556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anterior cervical fixation: analysis of load-sharing and stability with use of static and dynamic plates.
    Brodke DS; Klimo P; Bachus KN; Braun JT; Dailey AT
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Jul; 88(7):1566-73. PubMed ID: 16818983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a locked plate and wedged graft effectively stabilizes flexion-distraction stage-3 injury in the lower cervical spine: a biomechanical study.
    Paxinos O; Ghanayem AJ; Zindrick MR; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Hadjipavlou A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 19127153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative biomechanical study of traditional and in-line plating systems following immediate stabilization of single and bi-level cervical segments.
    Hunter W; Bucklen B; Muzumdar A; Moldavsky M; Hussain M; Khalil S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 21824696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy: a biomechanical study.
    Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(8):845-9. PubMed ID: 15082982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do stand-alone interbody spacers with integrated screws provide adequate segmental stability for multilevel cervical arthrodesis?
    Paik H; Kang DG; Lehman RA; Cardoso MJ; Gaume RE; Ambati DV; Dmitriev AE
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1740-7. PubMed ID: 24462812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The biomechanical stability of a novel spacer with integrated plate in contiguous two-level and three-level ACDF models: an in vitro cadaveric study.
    Clavenna AL; Beutler WJ; Gudipally M; Moldavsky M; Khalil S
    Spine J; 2012 Feb; 12(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 22405617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adjacent-level biomechanics after single-level anterior cervical interbody fusion with anchored zero-profile spacer versus cage-plate construct: a finite element study.
    Li XF; Jin LY; Liang CG; Yin HL; Song XX
    BMC Surg; 2020 Apr; 20(1):66. PubMed ID: 32252742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of stiffness and failure load of two cervical spine fixation techniques in an in vitro human model.
    Hart R; Gillard J; Prem S; Shea M; Kitchel S
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Feb; 18 Suppl():S115-8. PubMed ID: 15699796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up.
    Chen Y; Lü G; Wang B; Li L; Kuang L
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2255-62. PubMed ID: 26906171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.