These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28960848)

  • 1. Influence of thickness, color, and polishing process of ethylene-vinyl-acetate sheets on surface roughness and microorganism adhesion.
    Almeida MH; Ceschim GV; Iorio NLPP; Póvoa HCC; Cajazeira MRR; Guimarães GS; Antunes LS; Antunes LAA
    Dent Traumatol; 2018 Feb; 34(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 28960848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of Biofilm Adhesion on CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicates Under Different Types of Intraoral Polishing.
    Catanoze IA; de Souza HS; Araújo RC; Limírio JPJDO; Duque C; Dos Santos PH; Pesqueira AA; Guiotti AM
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2022 May; 30(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 34862865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of different finishing and polishing agents on the surface roughness of cast pure titanium.
    Reddy ES; Patil NP; Guttal SS; Jagadish HG
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 17451480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morphology and bacterial colonisation of tooth/ceramic restoration interface after different cement excess removal techniques.
    Anami LC; Pereira CA; Guerra E; Assunção e Souza RO; Jorge AO; Bottino MA
    J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):742-9. PubMed ID: 22617433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of air polishing with glycine powder on titanium abutment surfaces.
    Cochis A; Fini M; Carrassi A; Migliario M; Visai L; Rimondini L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):904-9. PubMed ID: 22626061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites.
    Gönülol N; Yilmaz F
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40 Suppl 2():e64-70. PubMed ID: 22819955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of external and internal surface roughness modifications on ceramic flexural strength.
    Ruschel VC; Maia HP; Lopes GC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):903-8. PubMed ID: 24819531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials.
    Avsar A; Yuzbasioglu E; Sarac D
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 26768641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of polishing systems on stain susceptibility and surface roughness of nanocomposite resin material.
    Barakah HM; Taher NM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 24721503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of airborne-particle abrasion of presintered zirconia on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.
    Zhang M; Zhang Z; Ding N; Zheng D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):448-52. PubMed ID: 25749090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Full-contour Y-TZP ceramic surface roughness effect on synthetic hydroxyapatite wear.
    Sabrah AH; Cook NB; Luangruangrong P; Hara AT; Bottino MC
    Dent Mater; 2013 Jun; 29(6):666-73. PubMed ID: 23566765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of surface-finishing protocols on the roughness, color change, and translucency of different ceramic systems.
    Akar GC; Pekkan G; Çal E; Eskitaşçıoğlu G; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 24513427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of the surface roughness of porcelain on the adhesion of oral Streptococcus mutans.
    Al-Marzok MI; Al-Azzawi HJ
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E017-24. PubMed ID: 20020077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of surface sealant agents on the surface roughness and color stability of artificial teeth.
    Şahin O; Dede DÖ; Köroğlu A; Yılmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 25913372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific surface roughness values for resin based materials.
    Grossman ES; Rosen M; Cleaton-Jones PE; Volchansky A
    SADJ; 2004 Aug; 59(7):274, 276, 278-9. PubMed ID: 15537027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of different polishing protocols on the surface roughness of Y-TZP surfaces used for custom-made implant abutments: a controlled morphologic SEM and profilometric pilot study.
    Happe A; Röling N; Schäfer A; Rothamel D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):440-7. PubMed ID: 25749083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of polishing procedures on the surface roughness of dental ceramics made by different techniques.
    Oliveira-Junior OB; Buso L; Fujiy FH; Lombardo GH; Campos F; Sarmento HR; Souza RO
    Gen Dent; 2013; 61(1):e4-8. PubMed ID: 23302371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness of polishing kits: influence on surface roughness of zirconia.
    Preis V; Grumser K; Schneider-Feyrer S; Behr M; Rosentritt M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(2):149-51. PubMed ID: 25822299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of different surface treatments on stainability of ceramics.
    Motro PF; Kursoglu P; Kazazoglu E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):231-7. PubMed ID: 23031729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.