209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28960851)
1. The contribution of a directional preference of stiffness to the efficacy of prophylactic sacral dressings in protecting healthy and diabetic tissues from pressure injury: computational modelling studies.
Levy A; Schwartz D; Gefen A
Int Wound J; 2017 Dec; 14(6):1370-1377. PubMed ID: 28960851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the Biomechanical Effects of Prophylactic Sacral Dressings on Tissue Loads: A Computational Modeling Analysis.
Levy A; Gefen A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2017 Oct; 63(10):48-55. PubMed ID: 29091038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The biomechanical protective effects of a treatment dressing on the soft tissues surrounding a non-offloaded sacral pressure ulcer.
Schwartz D; Gefen A
Int Wound J; 2019 Jun; 16(3):684-695. PubMed ID: 30697945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer Modeling Studies to Assess Whether a Prophylactic Dressing Reduces the Risk for Deep Tissue Injury in the Heels of Supine Patients with Diabetes.
Levy A; Gefen A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Apr; 62(4):42-52. PubMed ID: 27065218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Computer Modeling Study to Assess the Durability of Prophylactic Dressings Subjected to Moisture in Biomechanical Pressure Injury Prevention.
Schwartz D; Levy A; Gefen A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2018 Jul; 64(7):18-26. PubMed ID: 30059336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer Modeling of Prophylactic Dressings: An Indispensable Guide for Healthcare Professionals.
Gefen A; Alves P; Creehan S; Call E; Santamaria N
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2019 Jul; 32(7S Suppl 1):S4-S13. PubMed ID: 31219896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sacral Soft Tissue Deformations When Using a Prophylactic Multilayer Dressing and Positioning System: MRI Studies.
Peko Cohen L; Levy A; Shabshin N; Neeman Z; Gefen A
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2018; 45(5):432-437. PubMed ID: 30086102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Release of sodium pyruvate from sacral prophylactic dressings: A computational model.
Levy A; Kottner J; Gefen A
Int Wound J; 2019 Aug; 16(4):1000-1008. PubMed ID: 31063243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of loading and prophylactic dressings on the sacral and heel skin: An exploratory cross-over trial.
Lichterfeld-Kottner A; Vogt A; Tomova-Simitchieva T; Blume-Peytavi U; Kottner J
Int Wound J; 2021 Dec; 18(6):909-922. PubMed ID: 33939289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Protecting prone positioned patients from facial pressure ulcers using prophylactic dressings: A timely biomechanical analysis in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Peko L; Barakat-Johnson M; Gefen A
Int Wound J; 2020 Dec; 17(6):1595-1606. PubMed ID: 32618418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The biomechanical efficacy of a dressing with a soft cellulose fluff core in prophylactic use.
Gefen A; Krämer M; Brehm M; Burckardt S
Int Wound J; 2020 Dec; 17(6):1968-1985. PubMed ID: 32869507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Silicone Foam Dressing for Prevention of Sacral Deep Tissue Injuries Among Cardiac Surgery Patients.
Strauss R; Preston A; Zalman DC; Rao AD
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2019 Mar; 32(3):139-142. PubMed ID: 30801352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the effects of three different multilayer dressings for pressure ulcer prevention on sacral skin after prolonged loading: An exploratory crossover trial.
Lechner A; Rancan F; Hadam S; Vogt A; Blume-Peytavi U; Kottner J
Wound Repair Regen; 2021 Mar; 29(2):270-279. PubMed ID: 33347667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness and Value of Prophylactic 5-Layer Foam Sacral Dressings to Prevent Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in Acute Care Hospitals: An Observational Cohort Study.
Padula WV
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2017; 44(5):413-419. PubMed ID: 28816929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computational studies of the biomechanical efficacy of a minimum tissue deformation mattress in protecting from sacral pressure ulcers in a supine position.
Lustig M; Gefen A
Int Wound J; 2022 Aug; 19(5):1111-1120. PubMed ID: 34725917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prophylactic sacral protective dressings' effect on preventing pressure injury: A meta-analysis.
Gong X; Xu R
Int Wound J; 2022 Oct; 19(6):1463-1470. PubMed ID: 34962078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Use of Prophylactic Foam Dressings for Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries: A Systematic Review.
Sillmon K; Moran C; Shook L; Lawson C; Burfield AH
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2021 May-Jun 01; 48(3):211-218. PubMed ID: 33951710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New Clinically Relevant Method to Evaluate the Life Span of Prophylactic Sacral Dressings.
Burton JN; Fredrickson AG; Capunay C; Tanner L; Oberg C; Santamaria N; Gefen A; Call E
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2019 Jul; 32(7S Suppl 1):S14-S20. PubMed ID: 31219897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring Tensile Strength to Better Establish Protective Capacity of Sacral Prophylactic Dressings Over 7 Days of Laboratory Aging.
Burton JN; Fredrickson AG; Capunay C; Tanner L; Oberg C; Santamaria N; Gefen A; Call E
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2019 Jul; 32(7S Suppl 1):S21-S27. PubMed ID: 31219898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EffEctiveness of Prophylactic fOam dressings in the prevention of saCral pressure injuries in at-risk hospitalised patients: the EEPOC trial.
Walker RM; Chaboyer W; Cooke M; Whitty JA; Thalib L; Lockwood I; Latimer S; Campbell J; Probert R; Gillespie BM
Trials; 2023 Jan; 24(1):70. PubMed ID: 36721259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
