365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28960858)
1. Application of microscope-based scanning software (Panoptiq) for the interpretation of cervicovaginal cytology specimens.
Groen R; Abe K; Yoon HS; Li Z; Shen R; Yoshikawa A; Nitanda T; Shimizu Y; Otsuka I; Fukuoka J
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Dec; 125(12):918-925. PubMed ID: 28960858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of glass slides and various digital-slide modalities for cytopathology screening and interpretation.
Hanna MG; Monaco SE; Cuda J; Xing J; Ahmed I; Pantanowitz L
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Sep; 125(9):701-709. PubMed ID: 28558124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital slide imaging in cervicovaginal cytology: a pilot study.
Wright AM; Smith D; Dhurandhar B; Fairley T; Scheiber-Pacht M; Chakraborty S; Gorman BK; Mody D; Coffey DM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 May; 137(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 22970841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of panoramic digital images using Panoptiq for frozen section diagnosis.
Pradhan D; Monaco SE; Parwani AV; Ahmed I; Duboy J; Pantanowitz L
J Pathol Inform; 2016; 7():26. PubMed ID: 27217976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bethesda 2001 implementation and reporting rates: 2003 practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Davey DD; Neal MH; Wilbur DC; Colgan TJ; Styer PE; Mody DR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 Nov; 128(11):1224-9. PubMed ID: 15504056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-human papilloma virus associated adenocarcinomas of the cervix uteri. Cytologic features and diagnostic agreement using whole slide digital cytology imaging.
Negri G; Macciocu E; Cepurnaite R; Kasal A; Troncone G; Steinkasserer M; Vittadello F
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Feb; 49(2):316-321. PubMed ID: 33118707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of glass and digital slides for cervical cytopathology screening and interpretation.
de Velozo G; Cordeiro J; Sousa J; Holanda AC; Pessoa G; Porfírio M; Távora F
Diagn Cytopathol; 2023 Dec; 51(12):735-743. PubMed ID: 37587842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of using the Omnyx digital pathology system for cytology practice.
Hanna MG; Pantanowitz L
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(4):182-189. PubMed ID: 31272601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advantage of Z-stacking for teleconsultation between the USA and Colombia.
Mosquera-Zamudio A; Hanna MG; Parra-Medina R; Piedrahita AC; Rodriguez-Urrego PA; Pantanowitz L
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Jan; 47(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30457226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital whole slide imaging in cytology.
Cucoranu IC; Parwani AV; Pantanowitz L
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Mar; 138(3):300. PubMed ID: 24576021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated screening of gynecologic cytology: a comparison of results.
Alameda F; Pijuan L; Lloveras B; Soler I; Romero E; Carreras R; Serrano S
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2011 Feb; 33(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 22125843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Altered recognition of reparative changes in ThinPrep specimens in the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytology Program.
Snyder TM; Renshaw AA; Styer PE; Mody DR; Colgan TJ;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Jul; 129(7):861-5. PubMed ID: 15974808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital Applications in Cytopathology: Problems, Rationalizations, and Alternative Approaches.
Chantziantoniou N; Mukherjee M; Donnelly AD; Pantanowitz L; Austin RM
Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 29183021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agreement between cytotechnologists and cytopathologists as a new measure of cytopathologist performance in gynecologic cytology.
Quinn AM; Minhajuddin AT; Hynan LS; Reisch JS; Cibas ES
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Jul; 125(7):576-580. PubMed ID: 28346747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wide-field computational imaging of pathology slides using lens-free on-chip microscopy.
Greenbaum A; Zhang Y; Feizi A; Chung PL; Luo W; Kandukuri SR; Ozcan A
Sci Transl Med; 2014 Dec; 6(267):267ra175. PubMed ID: 25520396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of cervical histopathology variability using whole slide digitized images versus glass slides: experience with a statewide registry.
Gage JC; Joste N; Ronnett BM; Stoler M; Hunt WC; Schiffman M; Wheeler CM
Hum Pathol; 2013 Nov; 44(11):2542-8. PubMed ID: 24075599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. iPathology cockpit diagnostic station: validation according to College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center recommendation at the Hospital Trust and University of Verona.
Brunelli M; Beccari S; Colombari R; Gobbo S; Giobelli L; Pellegrini A; Chilosi M; Lunardi M; Martignoni G; Scarpa A; Eccher A
Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 25565219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of whole slide imaging in the primary diagnosis of gynaecological pathology in a University Hospital.
Ordi J; Castillo P; Saco A; Del Pino M; Ordi O; Rodríguez-Carunchio L; Ramírez J
J Clin Pathol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 25355520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of cytopathology specimens for digital pathology.
Miguel R; Gregorio B; Santos C; Andriotti C; Valle L; Saieg M
Cytopathology; 2023 Jul; 34(4):302-307. PubMed ID: 36974500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is there a role for the thinprep imaging system in reporting anal cytology?
Margaret Roberts J; Jin F; Ekman D; Kay Adams M; Lindsay McDonald R; Kathleen Thurloe J; Richards A; Mary Poynten I; Law C; Kincaid Fairley C; John Hillman R; Tabrizi SN; Marie Cornall A; James Templeton D; Marie Garland S; Edwin Grulich A; Farnsworth A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 May; 44(5):384-8. PubMed ID: 26876374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
