These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28961435)
1. Uneven-aged silviculture can enhance within stand heterogeneity and beetle diversity. Joelsson K; Hjältén J; Work T J Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 205():1-8. PubMed ID: 28961435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Forest management strategy affects saproxylic beetle assemblages: A comparison of even and uneven-aged silviculture using direct and indirect sampling. Joelsson K; Hjältén J; Gibb H PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194905. PubMed ID: 29634728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ten-year responses of ground-dwelling spiders to retention harvest in the boreal forest. Pinzon J; Spence JR; Langor DW; Shorthouse DP Ecol Appl; 2016 Dec; 26(8):2579-2597. PubMed ID: 27907260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Saproxylic and non-saproxylic beetle assemblages in boreal spruce forests of different age and forestry intensity. Stenbacka F; Hjältén J; Hilszczański J; Dynesius M Ecol Appl; 2010 Dec; 20(8):2310-21. PubMed ID: 21265460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Functional diversity response to hardwood forest management varies across taxa and spatial scales. Murray BD; Holland JD; Summerville KS; Dunning JB; Saunders MR; Jenkins MA Ecol Appl; 2017 Jun; 27(4):1064-1081. PubMed ID: 28295816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A cross-continental comparison of plant and beetle responses to retention of forest patches during timber harvest. Baker SC; Halpern CB; Wardlaw TJ; Kern C; Edgar GJ; Thomson RJ; Bigley RE; Franklin JF; Gandhi KJ; Gustafsson L; Johnson S; Palik BJ; Spies TA; Steel EA; Weslien J; Strengbom J Ecol Appl; 2016 Dec; 26(8):2493-2504. PubMed ID: 27787926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Beetle diversity is higher in sunny forests due to higher microclimatic heterogeneity in deadwood. Lettenmaier L; Seibold S; Bässler C; Brandl R; Gruppe A; Müller J; Hagge J Oecologia; 2022 Mar; 198(3):825-834. PubMed ID: 35246751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lower alpha, higher beta, and similar gamma diversity of saproxylic beetles in unmanaged compared to managed Norway spruce stands. Gran O PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0271092. PubMed ID: 35802717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conservation value of low-productivity forests measured as the amount and diversity of dead wood and saproxylic beetles. Hämäläinen A; Strengbom J; Ranius T Ecol Appl; 2018 Jun; 28(4):1011-1019. PubMed ID: 29446863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Micro and macro-habitat associations in saproxylic beetles: implications for biodiversity management. Hjältén J; Stenbacka F; Pettersson RB; Gibb H; Johansson T; Danell K; Ball JP; Hilszczański J PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e41100. PubMed ID: 22848432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High levels of green-tree retention are required to preserve ground beetle biodiversity in boreal mixedwood forests. Work TT; Jacobs JM; Spence JR; Volney WJ Ecol Appl; 2010 Apr; 20(3):741-51. PubMed ID: 20437960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental drivers of forest biodiversity in temperate mixed forests - A multi-taxon approach. Tinya F; Kovács B; Bidló A; Dima B; Király I; Kutszegi G; Lakatos F; Mag Z; Márialigeti S; Nascimbene J; Samu F; Siller I; Szél G; Ódor P Sci Total Environ; 2021 Nov; 795():148720. PubMed ID: 34246131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trait-environment interactions of saproxylic beetles as a guide to biodiversity conservation strategies. Bergmark P; Hjältén J; Svensson J; Neumann W; Hekkala AM J Environ Manage; 2024 Jun; 360():121080. PubMed ID: 38733839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Edge effects and beta diversity in ground and canopy beetle communities of fragmented subtropical forest. Stone MJ; Catterall CP; Stork NE PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193369. PubMed ID: 29494680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fire and green-tree retention in conservation of red-listed and rare deadwood-dependent beetles in Finnish boreal forests. Hyvärinen E; Kouki J; Martikainen P Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1711-9. PubMed ID: 17181806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variations in dung beetles assemblages (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) within two rain forest habitats in French Guiana. Feer F Rev Biol Trop; 2013 Jun; 61(2):753-68. PubMed ID: 23885587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of within stand disturbance in plantation forests indicate complex and contrasting responses among and within beetle families. Mladenović S; Loskotová T; Boháč J; Pavlíček J; Brestovanský J; Horák J Bull Entomol Res; 2018 Dec; 108(6):750-764. PubMed ID: 29307311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diversity and deadwood-based interaction networks of saproxylic beetles in remnants of riparian cloud forest. Ramírez-Hernández A; Martínez-Falcón AP; Micó E; Almendarez S; Reyes-Castillo P; Escobar F PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214920. PubMed ID: 30978221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Land sharing in South Patagonia: Conservation of above-ground beetle diversity in forests and non-forest ecosystems. Lencinas MV; Sola FJ; Cellini JM; Peri PL; Martínez Pastur G Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 690():132-139. PubMed ID: 31284187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Small-scale spontaneous dynamics in temperate beech stands as an importance driver for beetle species richness. Zumr V; Remeš J; Nakládal O Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11974. PubMed ID: 35831430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]