These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28961871)

  • 1. Multisensory Interference in Early Deaf Adults.
    Heimler B; Baruffaldi F; Bonmassar C; Venturini M; Pavani F
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2017 Oct; 22(4):422-433. PubMed ID: 28961871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deaf, blind or deaf-blind: Is touch enhanced?
    Papagno C; Cecchetto C; Pisoni A; Bolognini N
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 234(2):627-36. PubMed ID: 26573575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visuo-tactile interactions in the congenitally deaf: a behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Hauthal N; Debener S; Rach S; Sandmann P; Thorne JD
    Front Integr Neurosci; 2014; 8():98. PubMed ID: 25653602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Event-related potential correlates of visuo-tactile motion processing in congenitally deaf humans.
    Villwock A; Bottari D; Röder B
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Jun; 170():108209. PubMed ID: 35283159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-modal motion aftereffects transfer between vision and touch in early deaf adults.
    Xiao K; Gao Y; Imran SA; Chowdhury S; Commuri S; Jiang F
    Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):4395. PubMed ID: 33623083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Extent of Task Specificity for Visual and Tactile Sequences in the Auditory Cortex of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing.
    Zimmermann M; Mostowski P; Rutkowski P; Tomaszewski P; Krzysztofiak P; Jednoróg K; Marchewka A; Szwed M
    J Neurosci; 2021 Nov; 41(47):9720-9731. PubMed ID: 34663627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reorganization of neural systems mediating peripheral visual selective attention in the deaf: An optical imaging study.
    Seymour JL; Low KA; Maclin EL; Chiarelli AM; Mathewson KE; Fabiani M; Gratton G; Dye MW
    Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 343():162-175. PubMed ID: 27668836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response speed advantage for vision does not extend to touch in early deaf adults.
    Heimler B; Pavani F
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 232(4):1335-41. PubMed ID: 24477765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-modal activation of auditory regions during visuo-spatial working memory in early deafness.
    Ding H; Qin W; Liang M; Ming D; Wan B; Li Q; Yu C
    Brain; 2015 Sep; 138(Pt 9):2750-65. PubMed ID: 26070981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development of visuotactile congruency effects for sequences of events.
    O'Dowd A; Cooney SM; Sorgini F; O' Rourke E; Reilly RB; Newell FN; Hirst RJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 Jul; 207():105094. PubMed ID: 33714049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual and Proprioceptive Influences on Tactile Spatial Processing in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders.
    Hense M; Badde S; Köhne S; Dziobek I; Röder B
    Autism Res; 2019 Dec; 12(12):1745-1757. PubMed ID: 31507084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Everything is worth when it is close to my body: How spatial proximity and stimulus valence affect visuo-tactile integration.
    Spaccasassi C; Romano D; Maravita A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():42-51. PubMed ID: 30412839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An invisible touch: Body-related multisensory conflicts modulate visual consciousness.
    Salomon R; Galli G; Łukowska M; Faivre N; Ruiz JB; Blanke O
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 88():131-139. PubMed ID: 26519553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task.
    Holmes NP; Sanabria D; Calvert GA; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1077(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 16483553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When vision influences the invisible distractor: tactile response compatibility effects require vision.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):763-74. PubMed ID: 24245501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tool use modulates early stages of visuo-tactile integration in far space: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Forsberg A; O'Dowd A; Gherri E
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Jul; 145():42-54. PubMed ID: 30970269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adapting the Crossmodal Congruency Task for Measuring the Limits of Visual-Tactile Interactions Within and Between Groups.
    Poole D; Couth S; Gowen E; Warren PA; Poliakoff E
    Multisens Res; 2015; 28(3-4):227-44. PubMed ID: 26288897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vision of the body and the differentiation of perceived body side in touch.
    Tamè L; Farnè A; Pavani F
    Cortex; 2013 May; 49(5):1340-51. PubMed ID: 22531552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multisensory stimulation with or without saccades: fMRI evidence for crossmodal effects on sensory-specific cortices that reflect multisensory location-congruence rather than task-relevance.
    Macaluso E; Frith CD; Driver J
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jun; 26(2):414-25. PubMed ID: 15907299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.