These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparative antibacterial effects of daptomycin, vancomycin and teicoplanin studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection. Bowker KE; Noel AR; MacGowan AP J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Nov; 64(5):1044-51. PubMed ID: 19759041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses of teicoplanin in Japanese patients with systemic MRSA infection. Ogawa R; Kobayashi S; Sasaki Y; Makimura M; Echizen H Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2013 May; 51(5):357-66. PubMed ID: 23458228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of dosing regimens of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin against methicillin-resistant Wei X; Zhao M; Xiao X J Chemother; 2021 Dec; 33(8):547-553. PubMed ID: 34080519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In Vivo Pharmacodynamic Target Investigation of Two Bacterial Topoisomerase Inhibitors, ACT-387042 and ACT-292706, in the Neutropenic Murine Thigh Model against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus. Lepak AJ; Seiler P; Surivet JP; Ritz D; Kohl C; Andes DR Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2016 Jun; 60(6):3626-32. PubMed ID: 27044547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo pharmacodynamic activity of the glycopeptide dalbavancin. Andes D; Craig WA Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2007 May; 51(5):1633-42. PubMed ID: 17307987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in children. Ramos-Martín V; Paulus S; Siner S; Scott E; Padmore K; Newland P; Drew RJ; Felton TW; Docobo-Pérez F; Pizer B; Pea F; Peak M; Turner MA; Beresford MW; Hope WW Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2014 Nov; 58(11):6920-7. PubMed ID: 25224001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling and simulation for the prediction of target attainment of ceftobiprole against meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using minimum inhibitory concentration and time-kill curve based approaches. Barbour AM; Schmidt S; Zhuang L; Rand K; Derendorf H Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2014 Jan; 43(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 24183800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment of Vancomycin, at Three Reported Infusion Modes, for Methicillin-Resistant Song X; Han M Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2022; 12():874401. PubMed ID: 35873144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pharmacodynamics of telavancin studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection. MacGowan AP; Noel AR; Tomaselli S; Elliott HC; Bowker KE Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2011 Feb; 55(2):867-73. PubMed ID: 21078943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pharmacodynamic comparison of linezolid, teicoplanin and vancomycin against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci collected from hospitals in Brazil. Kuti JL; Kiffer CR; Mendes CM; Nicolau DP Clin Microbiol Infect; 2008 Feb; 14(2):116-23. PubMed ID: 18076672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of a Novel Aminomethylcycline Antibiotic, KBP-7072, in the Neutropenic Murine Pneumonia Model against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Lepak AJ; Zhao M; Liu Q; Wang P; Wang Y; Bader JC; Ambrose PG; Andes DR Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2019 Mar; 63(3):. PubMed ID: 30559140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate the development of vancomycin resistance in meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Mei Q; Ye Y; Zhu YL; Cheng J; Yang HF; Liu YY; Li HR; Li JB Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2015 Jun; 45(6):652-6. PubMed ID: 25813394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pharmacodynamics of glycopeptides in the mouse peritonitis model of Streptococcus pneumoniae or Staphylococcus aureus infection. Knudsen JD; Fuursted K; Raber S; Espersen F; Frimodt-Moller N Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2000 May; 44(5):1247-54. PubMed ID: 10770759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the lantibiotic NAI-107 in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model. Lepak AJ; Marchillo K; Craig WA; Andes DR Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2015 Feb; 59(2):1258-64. PubMed ID: 25512404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing regimen optimization of teicoplanin in critically ill patients with sepsis. Chen CY; Xie M; Gong J; Yu N; Wei R; Lei LL; Zhao SM; Li RM; Dong X; Zhang XL; Zhou Y; Li SL; Cui YM Front Pharmacol; 2023; 14():1132367. PubMed ID: 37188268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ceftaroline efficacy against high-MIC clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates in an in vitro hollow-fibre infection model. Singh R; Almutairi M; Alm RA; Lahiri SD; San Martin M; Chen A; Ambler JE J Antimicrob Chemother; 2017 Oct; 72(10):2796-2803. PubMed ID: 29091195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo pharmacodynamic activity of tomopenem (formerly CS-023) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a murine thigh infection model. Sugihara K; Sugihara C; Matsushita Y; Yamamura N; Uemori M; Tokumitsu A; Inoue H; Kakuta M; Namba E; Nasu H; Koga T Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2010 Dec; 54(12):5298-302. PubMed ID: 20921311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PK/PD modeling of daptomycin against MRSA and MRSE and Monte Carlo simulation for bacteremia treatment. Menezes B; Alves I; Staudt K; Beltrame B; Michelin L; de Araújo BV; Tasso L Braz J Microbiol; 2021 Dec; 52(4):1967-1979. PubMed ID: 34337679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]