These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28962730)

  • 1. Differences in attractiveness comparing female profile modifications of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Yüksel AG; Iskender SY; Kuitert R; Papadopoulou AK; Dalci K; Darendeliler MA; Dalci O
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Oct; 152(4):471-476. PubMed ID: 28962730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attractiveness assessment by orthodontists and laypeople judging female profile modifications of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Kalin K; Iskender SY; Kuitert R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Aug; 160(2):276-282. PubMed ID: 34006425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of forehead and neck position on esthetics of class I, II and III profiles.
    Salehi P; Oshagh M; Aleyasin ZS; Pakshir HR
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):412-25. PubMed ID: 25126620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The ability of orthodontists and laypeople to discriminate mandibular stepwise advancements in a Class II retrognathic mandible.
    Barroso MC; Silva NC; Quintão CC; Normando D
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 23021117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the influence of chin prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician and layperson.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 41(7):839-46. PubMed ID: 22340990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facial attractiveness of skeletal class I and class II malocclusion as perceived by laypeople, patients and clinicians.
    Pace M; Cioffi I; D'antò V; Valletta A; Valletta R; Amato M
    Minerva Stomatol; 2018 Jun; 67(3):77-85. PubMed ID: 29308854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the influence of lower facial profile convexity on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 22883980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective classification of nose-lip-chin profiles and their relation to dentoskeletal traits.
    Tanikawa C; Takada K
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Nov; 17(4):226-38. PubMed ID: 24889019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of anteroposterior mandibular positions on facial attractiveness in Japanese adults.
    Kuroda S; Sugahara T; Takabatake S; Taketa H; Ando R; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 19121504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of facial esthetics by different observer groups of Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion.
    Ribas J; Paço M; Pinho T
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2018; 13(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 29687099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of mandibular prominence on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston C; Hunt O; Burden D; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Apr; 27(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 15817618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Video imaging--a computer facilitated approach to communication and planning in orthognathic surgery.
    Sarver DM
    Br J Orthod; 1993 Aug; 20(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 8399051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Treatment of Class II, division 2 malocclusion, in a case of facial hypodivergence].
    Planché P; Hadjean E
    Orthod Fr; 1997; 68(1):265-73. PubMed ID: 9432609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 7989819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of lower lip position on the perceived attractiveness of chin prominence.
    Modarai F; Donaldson JC; Naini FB
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Sep; 83(5):795-800. PubMed ID: 23530543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orthodontists' perceptions of the need for orthognathic surgery in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion based on extraoral examinations.
    Hodge TM; Boyd PT; Munyombwe T; Littlewood SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 22748990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Barbosa LAG; Araujo E; Behrents RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):914-920. PubMed ID: 28457269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
    Takriti M; Dashash M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.