310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28963522)
41. Ecology. Giant pandas in a changing landscape.
Loucks CJ; Lü Z; Dinerstein E; Wang H; Olson DM; Zhu C; Wang D
Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5546):1465. PubMed ID: 11711657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Assessment of ecosystem in giant panda distribution area based on entropy method and coefficient of variation].
Yan ZG; Li JQ
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2017 Dec; 28(12):4007-4016. PubMed ID: 29696897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effects of Household Resource Utilization Behaviors on Giant Panda Habitat under the Background of Aging: Evidence from Sichuan Province.
Song Z; Wu B; Huang Y; Zhu S; Gao L; Li Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(22):. PubMed ID: 36430136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Sustainable harvest, people and pandas: Assessing a decade of managed wild harvest and trade in Schisandra sphenanthera.
Brinckmann JA; Luo W; Xu Q; He X; Wu J; Cunningham AB
J Ethnopharmacol; 2018 Oct; 224():522-534. PubMed ID: 29883683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Metabolic rates of giant pandas inform conservation strategies.
Fei Y; Hou R; Spotila JR; Paladino FV; Qi D; Zhang Z
Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27248. PubMed ID: 27264109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Estimating the social and ecological impact of community-based ecotourism in giant panda habitats.
Ma B; Yin R; Zheng J; Wen Y; Hou Y
J Environ Manage; 2019 Nov; 250():109506. PubMed ID: 31499468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Conservation planning beyond giant pandas: the need for an innovative telecoupling framework.
Wang F; Liu J
Sci China Life Sci; 2017 May; 60(5):551-554. PubMed ID: 28303460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Eco-compensation for giant panda habitat.
Yang B; Busch J; Zhang L; Ran J; Gu X; Zhang W; Du B; Mittermeier RA
Science; 2013 Feb; 339(6119):521. PubMed ID: 23371999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Assessing Greater Sage-Grouse Selection of Brood-Rearing Habitat Using Remotely-Sensed Imagery: Can Readily Available High-Resolution Imagery Be Used to Identify Brood-Rearing Habitat Across a Broad Landscape?
Westover M; Baxter J; Baxter R; Day C; Jensen R; Petersen S; Larsen R
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0156290. PubMed ID: 27218829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Applying habitat and population-density models to land-cover time series to inform IUCN Red List assessments.
Santini L; Butchart SHM; Rondinini C; Benítez-López A; Hilbers JP; Schipper AM; Cengic M; Tobias JA; Huijbregts MAJ
Conserv Biol; 2019 Oct; 33(5):1084-1093. PubMed ID: 30653250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effects of payments for ecosystem services on wildlife habitat recovery.
Tuanmu MN; Viña A; Yang W; Chen X; Shortridge AM; Liu J
Conserv Biol; 2016 Aug; 30(4):827-35. PubMed ID: 26808168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Examining the rationality of Giant Panda National Park's zoning designations and management measures for habitat conservation: Insights from interpretable machine learning methods.
Xu Y; Tang J
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Apr; 920():170955. PubMed ID: 38354805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Identifying the possibilities and pitfalls of conducting IUCN Red List assessments from remotely sensed habitat information based on insights from poorly known Cuban mammals.
Duncan C; Böhm M; Turvey ST
Conserv Biol; 2021 Oct; 35(5):1598-1614. PubMed ID: 33554359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Plants on the IUCN Red List: setting priorities to inform conservation.
Schatz GE
Trends Plant Sci; 2009 Nov; 14(11):638-42. PubMed ID: 19773196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Assessment and spatial partitioning of ecosystem services importance in Giant Panda National Park: To provide targeted ecological protection.
Li Z; Zhu J
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278877. PubMed ID: 36490286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Premature downgrade of panda's status.
Kang D; Li J
Science; 2016 Oct; 354(6310):295. PubMed ID: 27846523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. A practical guide to the application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria.
Rodríguez JP; Keith DA; Rodríguez-Clark KM; Murray NJ; Nicholson E; Regan TJ; Miller RM; Barrow EG; Bland LM; Boe K; Brooks TM; Oliveira-Miranda MA; Spalding M; Wit P
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Feb; 370(1662):20140003. PubMed ID: 25561664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Gap Analysis of Giant Panda Conservation as an Example for Planning China's National Park System.
Yang B; Qin S; Xu W; Busch J; Yang X; Gu X; Yang Z; Wang B; Dai Q; Xu Y
Curr Biol; 2020 Apr; 30(7):1287-1291.e2. PubMed ID: 32197079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The Lushan earthquake and the giant panda: impacts and conservation.
Zhang Z; Yuan S; Qi D; Zhang M
Integr Zool; 2014 Jun; 9(3):376-8. PubMed ID: 24952972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Measuring Terrestrial Area of Habitat (AOH) and Its Utility for the IUCN Red List.
Brooks TM; Pimm SL; Akçakaya HR; Buchanan GM; Butchart SHM; Foden W; Hilton-Taylor C; Hoffmann M; Jenkins CN; Joppa L; Li BV; Menon V; Ocampo-Peñuela N; Rondinini C
Trends Ecol Evol; 2019 Nov; 34(11):977-986. PubMed ID: 31324345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
