These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28964084)

  • 1. Effect of duration and gating of the signal on the binaural masking level difference for narrowband and broadband maskers.
    Verhey JL; Yasin I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Sep; 142(3):EL258. PubMed ID: 28964084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of across-frequency processes in dichotic listening conditions.
    Nitschmann M; Verhey JL; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3188-98. PubMed ID: 20000932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binaural masking experiments using noise maskers with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences. I: Influence of signal and masker duration.
    Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1737-48. PubMed ID: 2262630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study.
    Wong WY; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14770018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binaural detection of 500-Hz tones in broadband and in narrowband masking noise: effects of signal/masker duration and forward masking fringes.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):2981-93. PubMed ID: 16708954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Off-frequency BMLD: the role of monaural processing.
    van de Par S; Luebken B; Verhey JL; Kohlrausch A
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():293-301. PubMed ID: 23716235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of signal duration, signal frequency and masker duration on binaural masking level differences.
    Kohlrausch A
    Hear Res; 1986; 23(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 3745025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binaural masking experiments using noise maskers with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences. II: Influence of frequency and interaural-phase uncertainty.
    Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1749-56. PubMed ID: 2262631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory filter shape derived from binaural masking experiments.
    Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Aug; 84(2):573-83. PubMed ID: 3170949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural modulation masking.
    Grantham DW; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 2030221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal integration at 6 kHz as a function of masker bandwidth.
    Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1033-42. PubMed ID: 9479757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The phase angle of addition in temporal masking for diotic and dichotic listening conditions.
    Yost WA; Grantham DW; Lutfi RA; Stern RM
    Hear Res; 1982 Aug; 7(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 7118730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration.
    Schooneveldt GP; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):273-81. PubMed ID: 2921409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binaural masking-level difference as a function of masker and test-signal duration.
    Zwicker UT; Zwicker E
    Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 13(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 6735929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences between psychophysical "suppression effects" under diotic and dichotic listening conditions.
    Yama MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Nov; 72(5):1380-3. PubMed ID: 7175022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binaural signal detection, overall masking level, and masker interaural correlation: revisiting the internal noise hypothesis.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3850-60. PubMed ID: 19206811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.
    Langhans A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3456-70. PubMed ID: 1619122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of diotic and dichotic level-randomization on the binaural masking-level difference.
    Henning GB; Richards VM; Lentz JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov; 118(5):3229-40. PubMed ID: 16334902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers: I. Results for human.
    Evilsizer ME; Gilkey RH; Mason CR; Colburn HS; Carney LH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):336-45. PubMed ID: 11831806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.