These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28964158)
1. Efficient parameterization of cardiac action potential models using a genetic algorithm. Cairns DI; Fenton FH; Cherry EM Chaos; 2017 Sep; 27(9):093922. PubMed ID: 28964158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detecting undetectables: Can conductances of action potential models be changed without appreciable change in the transmembrane potential? Jæger KH; Wall S; Tveito A Chaos; 2019 Jul; 29(7):073102. PubMed ID: 31370420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fitting membrane resistance along with action potential shape in cardiac myocytes improves convergence: application of a multi-objective parallel genetic algorithm. Kaur J; Nygren A; Vigmond EJ PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e107984. PubMed ID: 25250956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of model error on cardiac electrical wave state reconstruction using data assimilation. LaVigne NS; Holt N; Hoffman MJ; Cherry EM Chaos; 2017 Sep; 27(9):093911. PubMed ID: 28964160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Algorithm for multi-curve-fitting with shared parameters and a possible application in evoked compound action potential measurements. Spitzer P; Zierhofer C; Hochmair E Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():13. PubMed ID: 16504064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endogenous and half-center bursting in morphologically inspired models of leech heart interneurons. Tobin AE; Calabrese RL J Neurophysiol; 2006 Oct; 96(4):2089-106. PubMed ID: 16760353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Novel Bi-Level Framework for Fitting the Parameters in Cardiac Cellular Models. Pouranbarani E; Nygren A Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():2370-2373. PubMed ID: 30440883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A gradient model of cardiac pacemaker myocytes. Lovell NH; Cloherty SL; Celler BG; Dokos S Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2004; 85(2-3):301-23. PubMed ID: 15142749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computational cardiac electrophysiology: implementing mathematical models of cardiomyocytes to simulate action potentials of the heart. Bell MM; Cherry EM Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1299():65-74. PubMed ID: 25836575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A robust multi-objective optimization framework to capture both cellular and intercellular properties in cardiac cellular model tuning: Analyzing different regions of membrane resistance profile in parameter fitting. Pouranbarani E; Weber Dos Santos R; Nygren A PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0225245. PubMed ID: 31730631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alternans promotion in cardiac electrophysiology models by delay differential equations. Gomes JM; Dos Santos RW; Cherry EM Chaos; 2017 Sep; 27(9):093915. PubMed ID: 28964124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A nonparametric approach to extract information from interspike interval data. Rossoni E; Feng J J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Jan; 150(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 16111762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reconstructing parameters of the FitzHugh-Nagumo system from boundary potential measurements. He Y; Keyes DE J Comput Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 23(2):251-64. PubMed ID: 17492372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Understanding cardiac alternans: a piecewise linear modeling framework. Thul R; Coombes S Chaos; 2010 Dec; 20(4):045102. PubMed ID: 21198114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]