These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28964449)

  • 1. Discordance in Utility Measurement in Persons with Neurological Conditions: A Comparison of the SF-6D and the HUI3.
    Abel H; Kephart G; Packer T; Warner G
    Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1157-1165. PubMed ID: 28964449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A view from the bridge: agreement between the SF-6D utility algorithm and the Health Utilities Index.
    O'Brien BJ; Spath M; Blackhouse G; Severens JL; Dorian P; Brazier J
    Health Econ; 2003 Nov; 12(11):975-81. PubMed ID: 14601159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health Condition Impacts in a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey Vary Substantially by Preference-Based Health Index.
    Hanmer J; Cherepanov D; Palta M; Kaplan RM; Feeny D; Fryback DG
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Feb; 36(2):264-74. PubMed ID: 26314728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) with the Short Form-36 preference-based SF-6D in chronic kidney disease.
    Davison SN; Jhangri GS; Feeny DH
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):340-5. PubMed ID: 18657096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of the health utilities index mark 3 and the short form 6D: evidence from an individual participant data meta-analysis of very preterm and very low birthweight adults.
    Bolbocean C; Anderson PJ; Bartmann P; Cheong JLY; Doyle LW; Wolke D; Petrou S
    Qual Life Res; 2023 Jun; 32(6):1703-1716. PubMed ID: 36705795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Baseline comparison of three health utility measures and the feeling thermometer among participants in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes trial.
    Raisch DW; Feeney P; Goff DC; Narayan KM; O'Connor PJ; Zhang P; Hire DG; Sullivan MD
    Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2012 Jul; 11():35. PubMed ID: 22515638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing short form 6D, standard gamble, and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 utility scores: results from total hip arthroplasty patients.
    Feeny D; Wu L; Eng K
    Qual Life Res; 2004 Dec; 13(10):1659-70. PubMed ID: 15651537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Salaffi F; Carotti M; Ciapetti A; Gasparini S; Grassi W
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011; 29(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 21813061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health State Utilities for Patient's Current Health from Bipolar Type I Disorder.
    Banihashemian M; Rashidian A; Gholamian F; Parsaeian M; Moradi N; Amini H
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2018 Mar; 21(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 29643263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population.
    Petrou S; Hockley C
    Health Econ; 2005 Nov; 14(11):1169-89. PubMed ID: 15942981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation and comparison of EuroQol and short form 6D in chronic prostatitis patients.
    Zhao FL; Yue M; Yang H; Wang T; Wu JH; Li SC
    Value Health; 2010 Aug; 13(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 20412540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The development of a model for translation of the Neck Disability Index to utility scores for cost-utility analysis in cervical disorders.
    Richardson SS; Berven S
    Spine J; 2012 Jan; 12(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 22209244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of life in cochlear implantees: comparing utility values obtained through the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form Survey-6D and the Health Utility Index Mark 3.
    Arnoldner C; Lin VY; Bresler R; Kaider A; Kuthubutheen J; Shipp D; Chen JM
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Nov; 124(11):2586-90. PubMed ID: 24536018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the EuroQol and short form 6D in Singapore multiethnic Asian knee osteoarthritis patients scheduled for total knee replacement.
    Xie F; Li SC; Luo N; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Fong KY; Thumboo J
    Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Aug; 57(6):1043-9. PubMed ID: 17665466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing differences in utility scores: a comparison of four widely used preference-based instruments.
    Wee HL; Machin D; Loke WC; Li SC; Cheung YB; Luo N; Feeny D; Fong KY; Thumboo J
    Value Health; 2007; 10(4):256-65. PubMed ID: 17645680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the HUI3 with the SF-36 preference based SF-6D in a clinical trial setting.
    Hatoum HT; Brazier JE; Akhras KS
    Value Health; 2004; 7(5):602-9. PubMed ID: 15367255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparison of UK and Brazilian SF-6D Preference Weights When Applied to a Brazilian Urban Population.
    Ferraz MB; Nardi EP; Campolina AG
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2019 Dec; 20():21-27. PubMed ID: 30634088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison and correlates of three preference-based health-related quality-of-life measures among overweight and obese women with urinary incontinence.
    Pinto AM; Kuppermann M; Nakagawa S; Vittinghoff E; Wing RR; Kusek JW; Herman WH; Subak LL
    Qual Life Res; 2011 Dec; 20(10):1655-62. PubMed ID: 21461953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the measurement properties and estimation of minimal important differences of the EQ-5D and SF-6D utility measures in patients with systemic sclerosis.
    Kwakkenbos L; Fransen J; Vonk MC; Becker ES; Jeurissen M; van den Hoogen FH; van den Ende CH
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2013; 31(2 Suppl 76):50-6. PubMed ID: 23910610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reliability and validity of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, EuroQol-5D, Health Utilities Index, and Short Form-6D outcome instruments in patients with proximal humeral fractures.
    Slobogean GP; Noonan VK; O'Brien PJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2010 Apr; 19(3):342-8. PubMed ID: 20189839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.