These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. The osmolality of nonionic, iodinated contrast agents as an important factor for renal safety. Lenhard DC; Pietsch H; Sieber MA; Ernst R; Lengsfeld P; Ellinghaus P; Jost G Invest Radiol; 2012 Sep; 47(9):503-10. PubMed ID: 22864374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Optimization of contrast-enhanced breast imaging: Analysis using a cascaded linear system model. Hu YH; Scaduto DA; Zhao W Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 28044312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Iodine delivery rate of different concentrations of iodine-containing contrast agents with rapid injection]. Knollmann F; Schimpf K; Felix R Rofo; 2004 Jun; 176(6):880-4. PubMed ID: 15173984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Coronary CT angiography with 80 kV tube voltage and low iodine concentration contrast agent in patients with low body weight. Andreini D; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Segurini C; Guglielmo M; Petullà M; Volpato V; Annoni A; Baggiano A; Formenti A; Bartorelli AL; Fiorentini C; Pepi M J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 27357327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of contrast media viscosity and temperature on injection pressure in computed tomographic angiography: a phantom study. Kok M; Mihl C; Mingels AA; Kietselaer BL; Mühlenbruch G; Seehofnerova A; Wildberger JE; Das M Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 24442161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computed tomography angiography. Marks MP Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 1996 Nov; 6(4):899-909. PubMed ID: 8824139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Identification of the iodine concentration that yields the highest intravascular enhancement in MDCT angiography. Behrendt FF; Pietsch H; Jost G; Palmowski M; Günther RW; Mahnken AH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1151-6. PubMed ID: 23617503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Are gadolinium-based contrast media really safer than iodinated media for digital subtraction angiography in patients with azotemia? Nyman U; Elmståhl B; Leander P; Nilsson M; Golman K; Almén T Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):311-8; discussion 328-9. PubMed ID: 11997530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Considering large-volume intravenous injections of iodinated contrast media for contrast-enhanced CT (head and body). Cohan RH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1292. PubMed ID: 7717251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The clotting issue: etiologic factors in thromboembolism. I. Chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicity of angiographic contrast agents. Dawson P Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S25-30. PubMed ID: 8282499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Katayama H; Yamaguchi K; Kozuka T; Takashima T; Seez P; Matsuura K Radiology; 1990 Jun; 175(3):621-8. PubMed ID: 2343107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multiple-detector computed tomographic angiography of pancreatic neoplasm for presurgical planning: comparison of low- and high-concentration nonionic contrast media. Ma X; Setty B; Uppot RN; Sahani DV J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):511-7. PubMed ID: 18664834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ionic low-osmolar versus nonionic iso-osmolar contrast media to obviate worsening nephropathy after angioplasty in chronic renal failure patients: the ICON (Ionic versus non-ionic Contrast to Obviate worsening Nephropathy after angioplasty in chronic renal failure patients) study. Mehran R; Nikolsky E; Kirtane AJ; Caixeta A; Wong SC; Teirstein PS; Downey WE; Batchelor WB; Casterella PJ; Kim YH; Fahy M; Dangas GD JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 May; 2(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 19463464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]