These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28965479)

  • 1. Effects of the weight configuration of hand load on trunk musculature during static weight holding.
    Madinei S; Ning X
    Ergonomics; 2018 Jun; 61(6):831-838. PubMed ID: 28965479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of external load configuration on trunk biomechanics and spinal loading during sudden loading.
    Madinei S; Motabar H; Ning X
    Ergonomics; 2018 Oct; 61(10):1364-1373. PubMed ID: 29920149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trunk response and stability in standing under sagittal-symmetric pull-push forces at different orientations, elevations and magnitudes.
    El Ouaaid Z; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A
    J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():166-174. PubMed ID: 29089111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transverse-contour modeling of trunk muscle-distributed forces and spinal loads during lifting and twisting.
    Davis JR; Mirka GA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jan; 25(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 10685481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The assessment of material handling strategies in dealing with sudden loading: the effects of load handling position on trunk biomechanics.
    Ning X; Zhou J; Dai B; Jaridi M
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Nov; 45(6):1399-405. PubMed ID: 24766903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Elevation and orientation of external loads influence trunk neuromuscular response and spinal forces despite identical moments at the L5-S1 level.
    El Ouaaid Z; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Arjmand N
    J Biomech; 2014 Sep; 47(12):3035-42. PubMed ID: 25065729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trunk muscle activity during holding two types of dynamic loads in subjects with nonspecific low back pain.
    Ershad N; Kahrizi S; Parnianpour M; Azghani MR; Khalaf K
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2022 Jul; 31():7-15. PubMed ID: 35710224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interface stability influences torso muscle recruitment and spinal load during pushing tasks.
    Lee PJ; Granata KP
    Ergonomics; 2006 Feb; 49(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 16540437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Specific phase related patterns of trunk muscle activation during lateral lifting and lowering.
    Huang QM; Andersson EA; Thorstensson A
    Acta Physiol Scand; 2003 May; 178(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 12713514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-benefit of muscle cocontraction in protecting against spinal instability.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jun; 25(11):1398-404. PubMed ID: 10828922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate effects of using insoles with various wedges on activation and co-contraction indices of selected trunk muscles during load lifting.
    Ghasemi MH; Anbarian M; Esmaeili H
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Oct; 88():103195. PubMed ID: 32678767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lifting over an obstacle: effects of one-handed lifting and hand support on trunk kinematics and low back loading.
    Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2004 Feb; 37(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 14706328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of gait retraining for reducing ambulatory knee load on trunk biomechanics and trunk muscle activity.
    Nüesch C; Laffer D; Netzer C; Pagenstert G; Mündermann A
    Gait Posture; 2016 Jun; 47():24-30. PubMed ID: 27264398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of changes in orientation and position of external loads on trunk muscle activity and kinematics in upright standing.
    El Ouaaid Z; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2014 Jun; 24(3):387-93. PubMed ID: 24650795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of trunk muscle coactivity on dynamic spinal loads.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Apr; 20(8):913-9. PubMed ID: 7644956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A functional subdivision of hip, abdominal, and back muscles during asymmetric lifting.
    Danneels LA; Vanderstraeten GG; Cambier DC; Witvrouw EE; Stevens VK; De Cuyper HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(6):E114-21. PubMed ID: 11246393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The assessment of material-handling strategies in dealing with sudden loading: the effect of uneven ground surface on trunk biomechanical responses.
    Zhou J; Ning X; Nimbarte AD; Dai F
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 25323963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trunk active response and spinal forces in sudden forward loading: analysis of the role of perturbation load and pre-perturbation conditions by a kinematics-driven model.
    Shahvarpour A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C; Bazrgari B
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 25476501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.