136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28965910)
1. Mammographic parenchymal pattern and breast cancer risk profile of Papua New Guinean women - A baseline study of the screening population.
Pape R; Spuur K; Umo P
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Nov; 23(4):e93-e98. PubMed ID: 28965910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of the BI-RADS assessment categories of Papua New Guinean women with mammographic parenchymal patterns, age and diagnosis.
Pape R; Spuur KM; Wilkinson JM; Umo P
J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Dec; 67(4):269-276. PubMed ID: 32936540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring correlations between the breast density of the women of Papua New Guinea and breast cancer risk factors.
Pape R; Spuur K; Umo P
Radiography (Lond); 2019 Nov; 25(4):e79-e87. PubMed ID: 31582256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk in New South Wales North Coast Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women.
Pape R; Spuur KM; Currie G; Greene L
J Med Radiat Sci; 2016 Jun; 63(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 27350887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parenchymal pattern in women with dense breasts. Variation with age and impact on screening outcomes: observations from a UK screening programme.
Ward L; Heller S; Hudson S; Wilkinson L
Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4717-4724. PubMed ID: 29808426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Percentage density, Wolfe's and Tabár's mammographic patterns: agreement and association with risk factors for breast cancer.
Gram IT; Bremnes Y; Ursin G; Maskarinec G; Bjurstam N; Lund E
Breast Cancer Res; 2005; 7(5):R854-61. PubMed ID: 16168132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening.
Checka CM; Chun JE; Schnabel FR; Lee J; Toth H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):W292-5. PubMed ID: 22358028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast density in screening mammography in Indian population - Is it different from western population?
Singh T; Khandelwal N; Singla V; Kumar D; Gupta M; Singh G; Bal A
Breast J; 2018 May; 24(3):365-368. PubMed ID: 29139590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Tabár classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns.
Gram IT; Funkhouser E; Tabár L
Eur J Radiol; 1997 Feb; 24(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 9097055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating risk of breast cancer from population incidence affected by widespread mammographic screening.
Taylor R; Boyages J
J Med Screen; 2001; 8(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 11480447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The implications of increased mammographic breast density for breast screening in Jordan.
Al-Mousa DS; Alakhras M; Spuur KM; Alewaidat H; Abdelrahman M; Rawashdeh M; Brennan PC
J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Dec; 67(4):277-283. PubMed ID: 32578380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Background parenchymal uptake on molecular breast imaging as a breast cancer risk factor: a case-control study.
Hruska CB; Scott CG; Conners AL; Whaley DH; Rhodes DJ; Carter RE; O'Connor MK; Hunt KN; Brandt KR; Vachon CM
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Apr; 18(1):42. PubMed ID: 27113363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic parenchymal patterns. Risk indicator for breast cancer?
Tabár L; Dean PB
JAMA; 1982 Jan; 247(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 7053455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is a dense mammographic parenchymal pattern a contraindication to hormonal replacement therapy?
Salminen TM; Saarenmaa IE; Heikkilä MM; Hakama M
Acta Oncol; 2000; 39(8):969-72. PubMed ID: 11207004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relation between Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns and Breast Cancer Risk: Considering BMI, Compressed Breast Thickness and Age of Women in Tabriz, Iran.
Mehnati P; Alizadeh H; Hoda H
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(4):2259-63. PubMed ID: 27221927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic parenchymal patterns as risk indicators for incident cancer in a screening program: an extended analysis.
Krook PM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Dec; 131(6):1031-5. PubMed ID: 104567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival.
Porter GJ; Evans AJ; Cornford EJ; Burrell HC; James JJ; Lee AH; Chakrabarti J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):676-83. PubMed ID: 17312053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
