BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28965991)

  • 21. Does an In-House Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Approach Contribute to Accuracy and Time Shortening in Mandibular Reconstruction?
    Numajiri T; Morita D; Yamochi R; Nakamura H; Tsujiko S; Sowa Y; Toyoda K; Tsujikawa T; Arai A; Hirano S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2020 Oct; 31(7):1928-1932. PubMed ID: 32649531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Morphological results of customized microvascular mandibular reconstruction: A comparative study.
    Tarsitano A; Ciocca L; Scotti R; Marchetti C
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 44(6):697-702. PubMed ID: 27107476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Continuity defects of the mandible: Comparison of three techniques for osseous reconstruction and their impact on implant loading.
    Okcu Y; Rustemeyer J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 May; 46(5):858-867. PubMed ID: 29622289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Computer-Assisted Designed and Manufactured Procedures Facilitate the Lingual Application of Mandible Reconstruction Plates.
    Probst FA; Metzger M; Ehrenfeld M; Cornelius CP
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 74(9):1879-95. PubMed ID: 27087284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation of a fibula graft cutting guide for mandibular reconstruction: experiment with rapid prototyping mandible model.
    Lim SH; Kim YH; Kim MK; Nam W; Kang SH
    Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2016 Dec; 21(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 27973958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of Fibula Reconstruction Using Patient-Specific Cad/Cam Plates: A Multicenter Study on 47 Patients.
    Zavattero E; Bolzoni A; Dell'Aversana G; Santagata M; Massarelli O; Ferri A; Della Monaca M; Copelli C; Gessaroli M; Valsecchi S; Borbon C; Beltramini GA; Ramieri G; Valentini V; Tartaro GP; Cocchi R; Varazzani A; Califano L; Baj A
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Jul; 131(7):E2169-E2175. PubMed ID: 33452834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Computer-Assisted Mandibular Reconstruction using a Patient-Specific Reconstruction Plate Fabricated with Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Techniques.
    Wilde F; Cornelius CP; Schramm A
    Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr; 2014 Jun; 7(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 25045420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mandibular reconstruction using plates prebent to fit rapid prototyping 3-dimensional printing models ameliorates contour deformity.
    Azuma M; Yanagawa T; Ishibashi-Kanno N; Uchida F; Ito T; Yamagata K; Hasegawa S; Sasaki K; Adachi K; Tabuchi K; Sekido M; Bukawa H
    Head Face Med; 2014 Oct; 10():45. PubMed ID: 25338640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Virtual Planning and Surgical Navigation for Mandibular Reconstruction With Free Fibula Flap.
    Yu Y; Zhang WB; Liu XJ; Guo CB; Yu GY; Peng X
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 74(7):1503.e1-1503.e10. PubMed ID: 27000408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of virtually 3D planned resection templates in mandibular reconstruction.
    Weijs WL; Coppen C; Schreurs R; Vreeken RD; Verhulst AC; Merkx MA; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 44(11):1828-1832. PubMed ID: 27713052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Simulated surgery and cutting guides enhance spatial positioning in free fibular mandibular reconstruction.
    Stirling Craig E; Yuhasz M; Shah A; Blumberg J; Salomon J; Lowlicht R; Fusi S; Steinbacher DM
    Microsurgery; 2015 Jan; 35(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 24470389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Three-dimensional planning and printing of guides and templates for reconstruction of the mandibular ramus and condyle using autogenous costochondral grafts.
    Emodi O; Shilo D; Israel Y; Rachmiel A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 55(1):102-104. PubMed ID: 27262174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Functional Outcome of CAD/CAM-Assisted versus Conventional Microvascular, Fibular Free Flap Reconstruction of the Mandible: A Retrospective Study of 30 Cases.
    Ritschl LM; Mücke T; Fichter A; Güll FD; Schmid C; Duc JMP; Kesting MR; Wolff KD; Loeffelbein DJ
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2017 May; 33(4):281-291. PubMed ID: 28099975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Axiographic results of CAD/CAM-assisted microvascular, fibular free flap reconstruction of the mandible: A prospective study of 21 consecutive cases.
    Ritschl LM; Mücke T; Fichter AM; Roth M; Kaltenhauser C; Pho Duc JM; Kesting MR; Wolff KD; Loeffelbein DJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 45(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 27919597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Deviation analysis in custom-made mandibular reconstruction: how to evaluate results.
    Gennaro P; Cascino F; Pignataro LV; Gabriele G
    BMJ Case Rep; 2022 Jul; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 35787497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis of simulated mandibular reconstruction using a segmental mirroring technique.
    Davies JC; Chan HHL; Jozaghi Y; Goldstein DP; Irish JC
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 47(3):468-472. PubMed ID: 30661926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Application of Combined Osteotomy and Reconstruction Pre-Bent Plate Position (CORPPP) Technology to Assist in the Precise Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects.
    Liang Y; Jiang C; Wu L; Wang W; Liu Y; Jian X
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 75(9):2026.e1-2026.e10. PubMed ID: 28600917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Newly designed retentive posts of mandibular reconstruction plate in oral cancer patients based on preliminary FEM study.
    Kwon IJ; Eo MY; Park SJ; Kim SM; Lee JH
    World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Nov; 14(1):292. PubMed ID: 27871294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-dimensional virtual technology in reconstruction of mandibular defect including condyle using double-barrel vascularized fibula flap.
    Wang WH; Zhu J; Deng JY; Xia B; Xu B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 41(5):417-22. PubMed ID: 23218981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. CAD-CAM plates versus conventional fixation plates for primary mandibular reconstruction: A biomechanical in vitro analysis.
    Rendenbach C; Sellenschloh K; Gerbig L; Morlock MM; Beck-Broichsitter B; Smeets R; Heiland M; Huber G; Hanken H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 45(11):1878-1883. PubMed ID: 28943180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.