295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28966068)
1. Stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies for mandibular setback: a longitudinal study.
Kung AYH; Leung YY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 47(2):152-159. PubMed ID: 28966068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of Pre-Orthodontic Orthognathic Surgery Using Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Versus Conventional Treatment.
Choi SH; Hwang CJ; Baik HS; Jung YS; Lee KJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 74(3):610-9. PubMed ID: 26259691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Major factors contributing to anterior and posterior relapse after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Choi SH; Kang DY; Cha JY; Jung YS; Yu HS; Park HS; Hwang CJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 44(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 26897301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Results in Good Long-Term Mandibular Stability in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism and Anterior Open Bite.
Choi SH; Cha JY; Park HS; Hwang CJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 74(4):804-10. PubMed ID: 26518527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is There a Difference in Stability or Neurosensory Function Between Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy and Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy for Mandibular Setback?
Al-Moraissi EA; Ellis E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1360-71. PubMed ID: 25871900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postoperative stability of two common ramus osteotomy procedures for the correction of mandibular prognathism: A randomized controlled trial.
Li DTS; Wang R; Wong NSM; Leung YY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 34627665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Postoperative stability for surgery-first approach using intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: 12 month follow-up.
Kim JY; Jung HD; Kim SY; Park HS; Jung YS
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 52(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 24746355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postoperative stability following bilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy based on amount of setback.
Jung HD; Jung YS; Kim SY; Kim DW; Park HS
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):822-6. PubMed ID: 23484677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Skeletal stability and condylar position related to fixation method following mandibular setback with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Roh YC; Shin SH; Kim SS; Sandor GK; Kim YD
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1958-63. PubMed ID: 25441865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does mandibular osteotomy affect gonial angle in patients with class III deformity? Vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split osteotomy.
Tabrizi R; Pakshir H; Behnia H; Akhlaghi S; Shahsavari N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Aug; 45(8):992-6. PubMed ID: 27012604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skeletal and dental stability after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: a long-term follow-up.
Schilbred Eriksen E; Wisth PJ; Løes S; Moen K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 46(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 27545999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term changes in mandibular and facial widths after mandibular setback surgery using intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Choi YJ; Ha YD; Lim H; Huh JK; Chung CJ; Kim KH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 45(9):1074-80. PubMed ID: 27156429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contributing factors to intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment as a relapse factor after mandibular setback with sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Yang HJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):e57-63. PubMed ID: 23830770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relapse after SSRO for mandibular setback movement in relation to the amount of mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment.
Han JJ; Yang HJ; Lee SJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 24411469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vertical ramus versus sagittal split osteotomies: comparison of stability after mandibular setback.
Yoshioka I; Khanal A; Tominaga K; Horie A; Furuta N; Fukuda J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1138-44. PubMed ID: 18486778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Skeletal and dental variables related to the stability of orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion with a surgery-first approach.
Ko EW; Lin SC; Chen YR; Huang CS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 71(5):e215-23. PubMed ID: 23455415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparisons of Jaw Line and Face Line after Mandibular Setback: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomies.
Chen CM; Tseng YC; Ko EC; Chen MY; Chen KJ; Cheng JH
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():1375085. PubMed ID: 30662900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stability of pre-orthodontic orthognathic surgery depending on mandibular surgical techniques: SSRO vs IVRO.
Choi SH; Yoo HJ; Lee JY; Jung YS; Choi JW; Lee KJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1209-15. PubMed ID: 27524382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Postoperative changes in mandibular prognathism surgically treated by intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Nihara J; Takeyama M; Takayama Y; Mutoh Y; Saito I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 22858240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
