295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28966068)
21. Orthognathic surgery for correction of patients with mandibular excess: don't forget to assess the gonial angle.
Guglielmi M; Schneider KM; Iannetti G; Feng C; Martinez AY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 71(6):1063-72. PubMed ID: 23541992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Surgical morbidities of sagittal split ramus osteotomy versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: a randomized clinical trial.
Leung YY; Wang R; Wong NSM; Li DTS; Au SW; Choi WS; Su YX
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 50(7):933-939. PubMed ID: 33168369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of skeletal stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with one-day maxillary-mandibular fixation followed by early jaw exercise.
Ohba S; Tasaki H; Tobita T; Minamizato T; Kawasaki T; Motooka N; Watanabe E; Yoshida N; Asahina I
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):586-92. PubMed ID: 23347885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of osseous healing after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Rokutanda S; Yamada S; Yanamoto S; Omori K; Fujimura Y; Morita Y; Rokutanda H; Kohara H; Fujishita A; Nakamura T; Yoshimi T; Yoshida N; Umeda M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1316-1321. PubMed ID: 29843949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Stability of mandibular setback surgery with and without presurgical orthodontics.
Kim CS; Lee SC; Kyung HM; Park HS; Kwon TG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):779-87. PubMed ID: 24268965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement.
Komori H; Kawanabe N; Kataoka T; Kato Y; Fujisawa A; Yamashiro T; Kamioka H
Cranio; 2018 Jul; 36(4):228-233. PubMed ID: 28436308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy and factors related to skeletal relapse.
Chen CM; Lai SS; Wang CH; Wu JH; Lee KT; Lee HE
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Apr; 35(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 20871995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Correlation between the change of gonial region and skeletal relapse after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Lee KT; Lai SS; Wu JH; Lee HE; Chen CM
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 May; 22(3):818-21. PubMed ID: 21558938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does the amount of mandibular setback during bimaxillary surgery correlate with the degree of surgical relapse?
Takahara N; Kimura A; Tomomatsu N; Nakakuki K; Yoda T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 May; 129(5):447-452. PubMed ID: 32102761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Relapse of skeletal class III with anterior open bite after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery depending on maxillary posterior impaction and mandibular counterclockwise rotation.
Kor HS; Yang HJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e230-8. PubMed ID: 24954529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: long-term stability.
Chen CM; Lee HE; Yang CF; Shen YS; Huang IY; Tseng YC; Lai ST
Ann Plast Surg; 2008 Jul; 61(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 18580150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?
Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the quality of life changes of patients receiving sagittal split ramus osteotomy or intraoral vertical subsigmoid osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Wong NSM; Leung YY
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Apr; 27(4):1435-1448. PubMed ID: 36881158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Retrospective study of changes in the sensitivity of the oral mucosa: sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO).
Hasegawa T; Tateishi C; Asai M; Imai Y; Okamoto N; Shioyasono A; Kimoto A; Akashi M; Suzuki H; Furudoi S; Komori T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 44(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 25468631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Skeletal Relapse After Mandibular Setback in Bi Max Surgery: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomies.
Al-Delayme RM; Al-Khen M
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2014 Dec; 13(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 26225013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Alteration of masticatory electromyographic activity and stability of orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion.
Ko EW; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 71(7):1249-60. PubMed ID: 23562358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is There a Difference in Stability After Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Between Vertically High-Angle and Normal-Angle Patients?
Choi SH; Kang DY; Cha JY; Jung YS; Baik HS; Hwang CJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 74(11):2252-2260. PubMed ID: 27403878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical significance of postoperative skeletal relapse in the treatment of mandibular prognathism: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Chen CM; Hsu HJ; Hsu KJ; Tseng YC
J Formos Med Assoc; 2022 Dec; 121(12):2593-2600. PubMed ID: 35843789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Criteria and limitations for selecting a sagittal split ramus osteotomy for patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and open bite.
Yoshioka I; Tanaka T; Habu M; Oda M; Kodama M; Kokuryo S; Kito S; Wakasugi-Sato N; Matsumoto-Takeda S; Seta Y; Fukudome Y; Tominaga K; Sakoda S; Morimoto Y
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Apr; 115(4):455-65. PubMed ID: 23021927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
