These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28966390)

  • 1. Erratum: Management Guidelines for Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Strategy on Followup.
    Indian J Orthop; 2017; 51(5):628. PubMed ID: 28966390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
    Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Management Guidelines for Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Strategy on Followup.
    Nakano N; Volpin A; Bartlett J; Khanduja V
    Indian J Orthop; 2017; 51(4):414-420. PubMed ID: 28790470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Role of Metal-on-Metal Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing: Review Article.
    Sands D; Schemitsch EH
    HSS J; 2017 Feb; 13(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 28167866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup.
    Vail TP; Mina CA; Yergler JD; Pietrobon R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():123-31. PubMed ID: 17006369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraoperative Complications and Mid-Term Follow-Up of Large-Diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.
    Miettinen SSA; Mäkinen TJ; Mäkelä K; Huhtala H; Kettunen JS; Remes V
    Scand J Surg; 2018 Jun; 107(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 29333941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: comparison of three designs from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Junnila M; Kostensalo I; Virolainen P; Remes V; Matilainen M; Vahlberg T; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Itälä A; Mäkelä K
    Scand J Surg; 2014 Mar; 103(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 24345980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Erratum: Bipolar hip arthroplasty for avascular necrosis of femoral head in young adults: Erratum.
    Indian J Orthop; 2015; 49(4):487. PubMed ID: 26229176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MRI findings in painful metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.
    Hayter CL; Gold SL; Koff MF; Perino G; Nawabi DH; Miller TT; Potter HG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Oct; 199(4):884-93. PubMed ID: 22997383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corrigendum.
    Paediatr Child Health; 2015; 20(8):466-7. PubMed ID: 26744561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs.
    Bengs BC; Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):755-62. PubMed ID: 19085491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Erratum: The History of Biomechanics in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Indian J Orthop; 2017; 51(5):629. PubMed ID: 28966391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current expert views on metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Consensus of the 6th advanced Hip resurfacing course, Ghent, Belgium, May 2014.
    Van Der Straeten C; De Smet KA
    Hip Int; 2016; 26(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26449333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
    Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Residual groin pain at a minimum of two years after metal-on-metal THA with a twenty-eight-millimeter femoral head, THA with a large-diameter femoral head, and hip resurfacing.
    Lavigne M; Laffosse JM; Ganapathi M; Girard J; Vendittoli P
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():93-8. PubMed ID: 21543697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a skeptic's view.
    Lachiewicz PF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():86-91. PubMed ID: 17632416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Progress of hip resurfacing arthroplasty].
    Chen G; Yang J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 22(6):665-8. PubMed ID: 18630558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Equal Primary Fixation of Resurfacing Stem, but Inferior Cup Fixation With Anterolateral vs Posterior Surgical Approach. A 2-Year Blinded Randomized Radiostereometric and Dual-energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Study of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.
    Hjorth MH; Lorenzen ND; Søballe K; Jakobsen SS; Stilling M
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3412-3420. PubMed ID: 28641972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The optimal metal-metal arthroplasty is still a total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative.
    Cuckler JM
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jun; 21(4 Suppl 1):74-6. PubMed ID: 16781434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metal ion levels in the blood of patients after hip resurfacing: a comparison between twenty-eight and thirty-six-millimeter-head metal-on-metal prostheses.
    Antoniou J; Zukor DJ; Mwale F; Minarik W; Petit A; Huk OL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90 Suppl 3():142-8. PubMed ID: 18676949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.