These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28967330)

  • 21. Cone Beam Computed Tomography for the Dental Implant Patient.
    Klokkevold PR
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Sep; 43(9):521-30. PubMed ID: 26820009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
    González-García R; Monje F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. CBCT in Advanced Dental Education: A Survey of U.S. Postdoctoral Periodontics Programs.
    Beals DW; Parashar V; Francis JR; Agostini GM; Gill A
    J Dent Educ; 2020 Mar; 84(3):301-307. PubMed ID: 32176341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Flapless, CBCT-guided osteotome sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant installation. I: radiographic examination and surgical technique. A prospective 1-year follow-up.
    Fornell J; Johansson LÅ; Bolin A; Isaksson S; Sennerby L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 21443611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The importance of cone-beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems: a review of the literature.
    Venskutonis T; Plotino G; Juodzbalys G; Mickevičienė L
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1895-901. PubMed ID: 25287321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Markers for implant placement in CBCT: a technical overview.
    Forbes-Haley CE; King PA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2013 Dec; 21(4):157-60. PubMed ID: 24479212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Novel low-dose protocols using cone beam computed tomography in dental medicine: a review focusing on indications, limitations, and future possibilities.
    Yeung AWK; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jun; 23(6):2573-2581. PubMed ID: 31025192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dental Cone-Beam Scans: Important Anatomic Views for the Contemporary Implant Surgeon.
    Greenstein G; Carpentieri JR; Cavallaro J
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015; 36(10):735-741; quiz742. PubMed ID: 26625166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification.
    Tolstunov L; Thai D; Arellano L
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography.
    Tyndall DA; Price JB; Tetradis S; Ganz SD; Hildebolt C; Scarfe WC;
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Jun; 113(6):817-26. PubMed ID: 22668710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evidence and Professional Guidelines for Appropriate Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Mallya SM
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Sep; 43(9):512-20. PubMed ID: 26820008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images.
    Correa LR; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A; Schropp L; da Silveira HE; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
    Lofthag-Hansen S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of the match between cone beam computed tomography and model scan data in template-guided implant planning: A prospective controlled clinical study.
    Schnutenhaus S; Gröller S; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):541-549. PubMed ID: 29691987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. CONE BEAM CT IN DENTAL IMPLANT PLANNING: HOW CLOSE ARE PATIENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS WITH DATA FROM PHANTOM STUDIES FOUND IN LITERATURE?
    Kottou S; Zapros A; Stefanopoulou N; Krompas N; Tsapaki V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(3):321-326. PubMed ID: 31297525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cone beam computed tomography scanning and diagnosis for dental implants.
    Greenberg AM
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2015 May; 27(2):185-202. PubMed ID: 25951956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of 2D vs 3D imaging and professional experience on dental implant treatment planning.
    Fortes JH; de Oliveira-Santos C; Matsumoto W; da Motta RJG; Tirapelli C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):929-936. PubMed ID: 29907931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Guidelines for the safe use of dental and maxillofacial CBCT: a review with recommendations for South Africa.
    Noffke CE; Farman AG; Nel S; Nzima N
    SADJ; 2011 Jul; 66(6):262, 264-6. PubMed ID: 23198473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Always Necessary for Dental Implant Placement?
    Deeb G; Antonos L; Tack S; Carrico C; Laskin D; Deeb JG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 75(2):285-289. PubMed ID: 27912075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evidence supporting the use of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Kuijpers MA; Bergé SJ; Schols JG; Maal TJ; Breuning H; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Mar; 143(3):241-52. PubMed ID: 22383204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.