899 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28967399)
1. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques.
Papadiochou S; Pissiotis AL
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):545-551. PubMed ID: 28967399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns.
Dolev E; Bitterman Y; Meirowitz A
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):124-128. PubMed ID: 29961628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems.
Kim EH; Lee DH; Kwon SM; Kwon TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 27677219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of different finish line preparations on the marginal and internal adaptation of cobalt-chromium metal alloy copings fabricated by using CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shah N; Badwaik P; Sheth VH; Bhatnagar V; Bhanushali N; Patil P
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):716-728.e6. PubMed ID: 34716012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
Hamza TA; Sherif RM
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns.
Tamac E; Toksavul S; Toman M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 24819532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol.
Dahl BE; Rønold HJ; Dahl JE
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):400-404. PubMed ID: 27692584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of porcelain firing and cementation on the marginal fit of implant-supported metal-ceramic restorations fabricated by additive or subtractive manufacturing methods.
Yildirim B
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):476.e1-476.e6. PubMed ID: 32451142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and the heat-press technique.
Mously HA; Finkelman M; Zandparsa R; Hirayama H
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 24795263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of fabrication stages and cementation on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Yilmaz B; Seker E; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):736-741. PubMed ID: 28434679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay/onlay restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies.
Goujat A; Abouelleil H; Colon P; Jeannin C; Pradelle N; Seux D; Grosgogeat B
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):590-597.e3. PubMed ID: 30509548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro evaluation of marginal fit zirconia crowns fabricated by a CAD-CAM dental laboratory and a milling center.
Meirowitz A; Bitterman Y; Levy S; Mijiritsky E; Dolev E
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):103. PubMed ID: 31196041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the Marginal Fit of Cobalt-Chromium Metal-Ceramic Crowns Fabricated by CAD/CAM Techniques and Conventional Methods at Three Production Stages.
Real-Voltas F; Romano-Cardozo E; Figueras-Alvarez O; Brufau-de Barbera M; Cabratosa-Termes J
Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(3):304–305. PubMed ID: 28319213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique.
Lima FF; Neto CF; Rubo JH; Santos GC; Moraes Coelho Santos MJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 29551386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques.
Witkowski S; Komine F; Gerds T
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16872930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-Supported Metal Copings Fabricated with 3 Different Techniques: An In Vitro Study.
Yildirim B; Paken G
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):315-320. PubMed ID: 30667169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
