BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

806 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28967862)

  • 1. Provision of information about newborn screening antenatally: a sequential exploratory mixed-methods project.
    Ulph F; Wright S; Dharni N; Payne K; Bennett R; Roberts S; Walshe K; Lavender T
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Oct; 21(55):1-240. PubMed ID: 28967862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consent for newborn screening: screening professionals' and parents' views.
    Ulph F; Dharni N; Bennett R; Lavender T
    Public Health; 2020 Jan; 178():151-158. PubMed ID: 31698137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility of a RCT of techniques for managing an impacted fetal head during emergency caesarean section: the MIDAS scoping study.
    Walker KF; Mitchell EJ; Ayers S; Jones NW; Ogollah R; Wakefield N; Dorling J; Pallotti P; Pillai A; Tempest N; Plachcinski R; Bradshaw L; Knight M; Thornton JG
    Health Technol Assess; 2023 Mar; 27(6):1-87. PubMed ID: 37022927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Routine gastric residual volume measurement to guide enteral feeding in mechanically ventilated infants and children: the GASTRIC feasibility study.
    Tume LN; Woolfall K; Arch B; Roper L; Deja E; Jones AP; Latten L; Pathan N; Eccleson H; Hickey H; Parslow R; Preston J; Beissel A; Andrzejewska I; Gale C; Valla FV; Dorling J
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 May; 24(23):1-120. PubMed ID: 32458797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Views of female genital mutilation survivors, men and health-care professionals on timing of deinfibulation surgery and NHS service provision: qualitative FGM Sister Study.
    Jones L; Danks E; Costello B; Jolly K; Cross-Sudworth F; Latthe P; Fassam-Wright M; Clarke J; Byrne A; Taylor J
    Health Technol Assess; 2023 Mar; 27(3):1-113. PubMed ID: 36946235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consent for newborn screening: parents' and health-care professionals' experiences of consent in practice.
    Etchegary H; Nicholls SG; Tessier L; Simmonds C; Potter BK; Brehaut JC; Pullman D; Hayeems R; Zelenietz S; Lamoureux M; Milburn J; Turner L; Chakraborty P; Wilson B
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Nov; 24(11):1530-1534. PubMed ID: 27302842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient preferences and current practice for adults with steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis: POPSTER mixed-methods study.
    Coates E; Wickramasekera N; Barr A; Shackley P; Lee M; Hind D; Probert C; Sebastian S; Totton N; Blackwell S; Bedford H; Dames N; Lobo A
    Health Technol Assess; 2022 Oct; 26(41):1-118. PubMed ID: 36305390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding Midwives' Preferences for Providing Information About Newborn Bloodspot Screening.
    Wright SJ; Ulph F; Lavender T; Dharni N; Payne K
    MDM Policy Pract; 2018; 3(1):2381468317746170. PubMed ID: 30288434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the feasibility and clinical value of further research to evaluate the management options for children with Down syndrome and otitis media with effusion: a feasibility study.
    Fortnum H; Leighton P; Smith MD; Brown L; Jones M; Benton C; Marder E; Marshall A; Sutton K
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Sep; 18(60):1-147, v-vi. PubMed ID: 25270051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A support package for parents of excessively crying infants: development and feasibility study.
    St James-Roberts I; Garratt R; Powell C; Bamber D; Long J; Brown J; Morris S; Dyson S; Morris T; Bhupendra Jaicim N
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Oct; 23(56):1-144. PubMed ID: 31597591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lessons learnt from implementing change in newborn bloodspot screening processes over more than a decade: Midwives, genetics and education.
    Nisselle A; Bishop M; Charles T; Morrissy S; King E; Metcalfe S; Gaff C
    Midwifery; 2019 Dec; 79():102542. PubMed ID: 31569029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Qualitative exploration of health professionals' experiences of communicating positive newborn bloodspot screening results for nine conditions in England.
    Chudleigh J; Chinnery H; Bonham JR; Olander E; Moody L; Simpson A; Morris S; Ulph F; Bryon M; Southern K
    BMJ Open; 2020 Oct; 10(10):e037081. PubMed ID: 33004391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stakeholder attitudes towards the role and application of informed consent for newborn bloodspot screening: a study protocol.
    Nicholls SG; Tessier L; Etchegary H; Brehaut JC; Potter BK; Hayeems RZ; Chakraborty P; Marcadier J; Milburn J; Pullman D; Turner L; Wilson BJ
    BMJ Open; 2014 Nov; 4(11):e006782. PubMed ID: 25421341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Communication of carrier status information following universal newborn screening for sickle cell disorders and cystic fibrosis: qualitative study of experience and practice.
    Kai J; Ulph F; Cullinan T; Qureshi N
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Nov; 13(57):1-82, iii. PubMed ID: 19948087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.