These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28968281)
21. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users. Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants. Hughes ML; Baudhuin JL; Goehring JL Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():44-56. PubMed ID: 25093283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Sensitivity of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve to Amplitude Modulation Cues Declines With Advanced Age. Riggs WJ; Vaughan C; Skidmore J; Conroy S; Pellittieri A; Carter BL; Stegman CJ; He S Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1358-1372. PubMed ID: 33795616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded Directly Through the Cochlear Implant in Cochlear Implant Recipients: a Feasibility Study. Attias J; HabibAllah S; Aditya Tarigoppula VS; Glick H; Chen C; Kanthaiah K; Litvak L Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 35245922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Effect of Pulse Polarity on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Children With Normal-Sized Cochlear Nerves. Xu L; Skidmore J; Luo J; Chao X; Wang R; Wang H; He S Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1306-1319. PubMed ID: 32141933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Neural Adaptation of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Is Not Affected by Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened, Middle-aged, and Elderly Adult Cochlear Implant Users. He S; Skidmore J; Conroy S; Riggs WJ; Carter BL; Xie R Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1228-1244. PubMed ID: 34999595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Responses of neurons in the feline inferior colliculus to modulated electrical stimuli applied on and within the ventral cochlear nucleus; Implications for an advanced auditory brainstem implant. McCreery D; Yadev K; Han M Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():85-97. PubMed ID: 29573880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and behavioral T-levels in implanted children with cochlear nerve deficiency. Chao X; Wang R; Luo J; Wang H; Fan Z; Xu L Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4309. PubMed ID: 36922582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ten-year follow-up of auditory brainstem implants: From intra-operative electrical auditory brainstem responses to perceptual results. Veronese S; Cambiaghi M; Tommasi N; Sbarbati A; Galvin JJ PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282261. PubMed ID: 36862753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Within- and across-frequency temporal processing and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Blankenship CM; Meinzen-Derr J; Zhang F PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275772. PubMed ID: 36227872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants. Hughes ML; Laurello SA Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():116-129. PubMed ID: 28633960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Effects of GJB2 or SLC26A4 Gene Mutations on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve in Children. Luo J; Xu L; Chao X; Wang R; Pellittieri A; Bai X; Fan Z; Wang H; He S Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):194-207. PubMed ID: 31124793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Auditory brainstem implant in posttraumatic cochlear nerve avulsion. Colletti V; Carner M; Miorelli V; Colletti L; Guida M; Fiorino F Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):247-55. PubMed ID: 15205552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts. Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Auditory brainstem implant (ABI): new frontiers in adults and children. Colletti V; Carner M; Miorelli V; Guida M; Colletti L; Fiorino F Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Jul; 133(1):126-38. PubMed ID: 16025066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users]. Zhu X; Cao K; Pan T; Yang H; Wang Y Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11944479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Relationship between gap detection thresholds and loudness in cochlear-implant users. Garadat SN; Pfingst BE Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):130-8. PubMed ID: 21168479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children. Colletti L Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 127(9):943-6. PubMed ID: 17712673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Age-Related Changes in Temporal Resolution Revisited: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Findings From Cochlear Implant Users. Mussoi BSS; Brown CJ Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1328-1344. PubMed ID: 31033701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]