These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28968494)

  • 1. Sourcing of Steam and Electricity for Carbon Capture Retrofits.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 51(21):12908-12917. PubMed ID: 28968494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12576-84. PubMed ID: 26422409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Viability of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Retrofits for Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants under an Emission Trading Scheme.
    Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 50(23):12567-12574. PubMed ID: 27792308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cost of carbon capture and storage for natural gas combined cycle power plants.
    Rubin ES; Zhai H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(6):3076-84. PubMed ID: 22332665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Energy, exergy and economic analyses of a novel biomass fueled power plant with carbon capture and sequestration.
    Yan L; Cao Y; He B
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 690():812-820. PubMed ID: 31302546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance and Cost Analysis of Natural Gas Combined Cycle Plants with Chemical Looping Combustion.
    Oh DH; Lee CH; Lee JC
    ACS Omega; 2021 Aug; 6(32):21043-21058. PubMed ID: 34423212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
    Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring the role of natural gas power plants with carbon capture and storage as a bridge to a low-carbon future.
    Babaee S; Loughlin DH
    Clean Technol Environ Policy; 2017 Dec; 20(2):379-391. PubMed ID: 32461751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Economic Merits of Flexible Carbon Capture and Sequestration as a Compliance Strategy with the Clean Power Plan.
    Craig MT; Jaramillo P; Zhai H; Klima K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 51(3):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 28001378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mapping the economy of coal power plants retrofitted with post-combustion and biomass co-firing carbon capture in China.
    Yuan J; Wang Y; Zhang W; Zhang J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):47438-47454. PubMed ID: 36738409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Policy-Driven Potential for Deploying Carbon Capture and Sequestration in a Fossil-Rich Power Sector.
    Dindi A; Coddington K; Garofalo JF; Wu W; Zhai H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jul; 56(14):9872-9881. PubMed ID: 35785993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reducing the energy penalty costs of postcombustion CCS systems with amine-storage.
    Patiño-Echeverri D; Hoppock DC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(2):1243-52. PubMed ID: 22214538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postcombustion Capture or Direct Air Capture in Decarbonizing US Natural Gas Power?
    Azarabadi H; Lackner KS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Apr; 54(8):5102-5111. PubMed ID: 32212696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Clark VR; Herzog HJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
    Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Water use at pulverized coal power plants with postcombustion carbon capture and storage.
    Zhai H; Rubin ES; Versteeg PL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2479-85. PubMed ID: 21329343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are renewables portfolio standards cost-effective emission abatement policy?
    Dobesova K; Apt J; Lave LB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov; 39(22):8578-83. PubMed ID: 16323750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The environmental and economic sustainability of carbon capture and storage.
    Hardisty PE; Sivapalan M; Brooks P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 May; 8(5):1460-77. PubMed ID: 21655130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Water impacts of CO2 emission performance standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(20):11769-76. PubMed ID: 25229670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Techno-Economic Assessment of Hybrid Cooling Systems for Coal- and Natural-Gas-Fired Power Plants with and without Carbon Capture and Storage.
    Zhai H; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(7):4127-34. PubMed ID: 26967583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.