197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28968726)
1. GradDock: rapid simulation and tailored ranking functions for peptide-MHC Class I docking.
Kyeong HH; Choi Y; Kim HS
Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 34(3):469-476. PubMed ID: 28968726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward the prediction of class I and II mouse major histocompatibility complex-peptide-binding affinity: in silico bioinformatic step-by-step guide using quantitative structure-activity relationships.
Hattotuwagama CK; Doytchinova IA; Flower DR
Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():227-45. PubMed ID: 18450004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. General Prediction of Peptide-MHC Binding Modes Using Incremental Docking: A Proof of Concept.
Antunes DA; Devaurs D; Moll M; Lizée G; Kavraki LE
Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):4327. PubMed ID: 29531253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In silico prediction of peptide binding affinity to class I mouse major histocompatibility complexes: a comparative molecular similarity index analysis (CoMSIA) study.
Hattotuwagama CK; Doytchinova IA; Flower DR
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(5):1415-23. PubMed ID: 16180918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of peptide binding to a major histocompatibility complex class I molecule based on docking simulation.
Ishikawa T
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Oct; 30(10):875-887. PubMed ID: 27624584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ab initio prediction of peptide-MHC binding geometry for diverse class I MHC allotypes.
Bordner AJ; Abagyan R
Proteins; 2006 May; 63(3):512-26. PubMed ID: 16470819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structural Prediction of Peptide-MHC Binding Modes.
Perez MAS; Cuendet MA; Röhrig UF; Michielin O; Zoete V
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2405():245-282. PubMed ID: 35298818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DynaDom: structure-based prediction of T cell receptor inter-domain and T cell receptor-peptide-MHC (class I) association angles.
Hoffmann T; Marion A; Antes I
BMC Struct Biol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):2. PubMed ID: 28148269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Structural prediction of peptides binding to MHC class I molecules.
Bui HH; Schiewe AJ; von Grafenstein H; Haworth IS
Proteins; 2006 Apr; 63(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 16447245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peptide-MHC class I stability is a better predictor than peptide affinity of CTL immunogenicity.
Harndahl M; Rasmussen M; Roder G; Dalgaard Pedersen I; Sørensen M; Nielsen M; Buus S
Eur J Immunol; 2012 Jun; 42(6):1405-16. PubMed ID: 22678897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DockTope: a Web-based tool for automated pMHC-I modelling.
Rigo MM; Antunes DA; Vaz de Freitas M; Fabiano de Almeida Mendes M; Meira L; Sinigaglia M; Vieira GF
Sci Rep; 2015 Dec; 5():18413. PubMed ID: 26674250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling the structure of bound peptide ligands to major histocompatibility complex.
Tong JC; Tan TW; Ranganathan S
Protein Sci; 2004 Sep; 13(9):2523-32. PubMed ID: 15322290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methods for prediction of peptide binding to MHC molecules: a comparative study.
Yu K; Petrovsky N; Schönbach C; Koh JY; Brusic V
Mol Med; 2002 Mar; 8(3):137-48. PubMed ID: 12142545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subangstrom accuracy in pHLA-I modeling by Rosetta FlexPepDock refinement protocol.
Liu T; Pan X; Chao L; Tan W; Qu S; Yang L; Wang B; Mei H
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Aug; 54(8):2233-42. PubMed ID: 25050981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. T cell receptor/peptide/MHC molecular characterization and standardized pMHC contact sites in IMGT/3Dstructure-DB.
Kaas Q; Lefranc MP
In Silico Biol; 2005; 5(5-6):505-28. PubMed ID: 16268793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. NetMHCpan-3.0; improved prediction of binding to MHC class I molecules integrating information from multiple receptor and peptide length datasets.
Nielsen M; Andreatta M
Genome Med; 2016 Mar; 8(1):33. PubMed ID: 27029192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated benchmarking of peptide-MHC class I binding predictions.
Trolle T; Metushi IG; Greenbaum JA; Kim Y; Sidney J; Lund O; Sette A; Peters B; Nielsen M
Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 31(13):2174-81. PubMed ID: 25717196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Static energy analysis of MHC class I and class II peptide-binding affinity.
Davies MN; Flower DR
Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():309-20. PubMed ID: 18450011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DynaPred: a structure and sequence based method for the prediction of MHC class I binding peptide sequences and conformations.
Antes I; Siu SW; Lengauer T
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e16-24. PubMed ID: 16873467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MHC-BPS: MHC-binder prediction server for identifying peptides of flexible lengths from sequence-derived physicochemical properties.
Cui J; Han LY; Lin HH; Tang ZQ; Jiang L; Cao ZW; Chen YZ
Immunogenetics; 2006 Aug; 58(8):607-13. PubMed ID: 16832638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
