BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1562 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28969413)

  • 1. The eternal enigma in prostatic biopsy access route.
    Fabiani A; Principi E; Filosa A; Servi L
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Oct; 89(3):245-246. PubMed ID: 28969413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A retrospective comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.
    Di Franco CA; Jallous H; Porru D; Giliberto GL; Cebrelli T; Tinelli C; Rovereto B
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Mar; 89(1):55-59. PubMed ID: 28403597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct comparison between transrectal and transperineal extended prostate biopsy for the detection of cancer.
    Kawakami S; Yamamoto S; Numao N; Ishikawa Y; Kihara K; Fukui I
    Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):719-24. PubMed ID: 17681062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparisons of cancer detection rate and complications between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy approaches - a single center preliminary study.
    Huang GL; Kang CH; Lee WC; Chiang PH
    BMC Urol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):101. PubMed ID: 31660936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shen PF; Zhu YC; Wei WR; Li YZ; Yang J; Li YT; Li DM; Wang J; Zeng H
    Asian J Androl; 2012 Mar; 14(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 22101942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transrectal versus transperineal 14-core prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a comparative evaluation at the same institution.
    Cerruto MA; Vianello F; D'Elia C; Artibani W; Novella G
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2014 Dec; 86(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 25641452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
    Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Questionnaire based evaluation of prostate biopsy complication comparing different bioptic schemes].
    Damiano R; Oliva A; Cantiello F; Esposito C; Perdonà S; De Sio M; Bitonti M; Sacco R; D'Armiento M
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2003 Mar; 75(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12741345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy May Perform Better Than Transrectal Route in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Tu X; Liu Z; Chang T; Qiu S; Xu H; Bao Y; Yang L; Wei Q
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Oct; 17(5):e860-e870. PubMed ID: 31281065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Detection of Prostate Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Prostate Biopsies is Superior with the Transperineal vs the Transrectal Approach. A European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-Institutional Study.
    Zattoni F; Marra G; Kasivisvanathan V; Grummet J; Nandurkar R; Ploussard G; Olivier J; Chiu PK; Valerio M; Gontero P; Guo H; Zhuang J; Barletta F; Leni R; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Hanegbi U; Landaumailto A; Snow R; Apfelbeck M; Kretschmer A; van den Bergh R; Novara G; Briganti A; Dal Moro F; Gandaglia G
    J Urol; 2022 Oct; 208(4):830-837. PubMed ID: 36082555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extensive biopsy using a combined transperineal and transrectal approach to improve prostate cancer detection.
    Watanabe M; Hayashi T; Tsushima T; Irie S; Kaneshige T; Kumon H
    Int J Urol; 2005 Nov; 12(11):959-63. PubMed ID: 16351651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal 14-core systematic biopsy detects apico-anterior cancer foci of T1c prostate cancer.
    Kawakami S; Kihara K; Fujii Y; Masuda H; Kobayashi T; Kageyama Y
    Int J Urol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 15285751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of transperineal and transrectal targeted prostate biopsy using Mahalanobis distance matching within propensity score caliper method: A multicenter study of Turkish Urooncology Association.
    Koparal MY; Sözen TS; Karşıyakalı N; Aslan G; Akdoğan B; Şahin B; Türkeri L;
    Prostate; 2022 Mar; 82(4):425-432. PubMed ID: 34927740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy on the Risk of Upgrading in Final Pathology in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy? An European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study.
    Zattoni F; Marra G; Martini A; Kasivisvanathan V; Grummet J; Harkin T; Ploussard G; Olivier J; Chiu PK; Valerio M; Marquis A; Gontero P; Guo H; Zhuang J; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Morlacco A; Kretschmer A; Barletta F; Heidegger I; Tilki D; van den Bergh R; Dal Moro F; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Novara G; Gandaglia G;
    Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):621-628. PubMed ID: 36746729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the complications of traditional 12 cores transrectal prostate biopsy with image fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy.
    Huang H; Wang W; Lin T; Zhang Q; Zhao X; Lian H; Guo H
    BMC Urol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):68. PubMed ID: 27855661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a retrospective study based on 452 patients.
    Lu M; Luo Y; Wang Y; Yu J; Zheng H; Yang Z
    BMC Urol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):11. PubMed ID: 36709292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison Between a Combined Transrectal and Transperineal Approach and a Transrectal Approach for Prostate Rebiopsy.
    Shida Y; Hakariya T; Takehara K; Onita T; Miyata Y; Sakai H
    Anticancer Res; 2016 Sep; 36(9):4685-90. PubMed ID: 27630313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A noninferiority within-person study comparing the accuracy of transperineal to transrectal MRI-US fusion biopsy for prostate-cancer detection.
    Ber Y; Segal N; Tamir S; Benjaminov O; Yakimov M; Sela S; Halstauch D; Baniel J; Kedar D; Margel D
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Sep; 23(3):449-456. PubMed ID: 31953483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy for detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
    Xue J; Qin Z; Cai H; Zhang C; Li X; Xu W; Wang J; Xu Z; Yu B; Xu T; Zou Q
    Oncotarget; 2017 Apr; 8(14):23322-23336. PubMed ID: 28177897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 79.