1576 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28969413)
21. Transperineal biopsy as a new technique versus well-established transrectal biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer - A comparative study.
Eltafahny A; Alshamlan Y; Almazeedi A; Aldousari S; Salem SM
Urol Ann; 2024; 16(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 38818431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prostate cancer detection rate of transrectal ultrasonography, digital rectal examination, and prostate-specific antigen: results of a five-year study of 6- versus 12-core transperineal prostate biopsy.
Bigliocchi M; Marini M; Nofroni I; Perugia G; Shahabadi H; Ciccariello M
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2007 Dec; 59(4):395-402; 403-6. PubMed ID: 17947956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A systematic review and meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound guided fusion biopsy of prostate for cancer detection-Comparing transrectal with transperineal approaches.
Loy LM; Lim GH; Leow JJ; Lee CH; Tan TW; Tan CH
Urol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):650-660. PubMed ID: 32505458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Three-dimensional combination of transrectal and transperineal biopsies for efficient detection of stage T1c prostate cancer.
Kawakami S; Hyochi N; Yonese J; Yano M; Fujii Y; Kageyama Y; Fukui I; Kihara K
Int J Clin Oncol; 2006 Apr; 11(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 16622747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of the complications of traditional 12 cores transrectal prostate biopsy with image fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy.
Huang H; Wang W; Lin T; Zhang Q; Zhao X; Lian H; Guo H
BMC Urol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):68. PubMed ID: 27855661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Do cancer detection rates differ between transperineal and transrectal micro-ultrasound mpMRI-fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? A propensity score-matched study.
Rakauskas A; Peters M; Martel P; van Rossum PSN; La Rosa S; Meuwly JY; Roth B; Valerio M
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280262. PubMed ID: 36652429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transperineal extended biopsy improves the clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate: a comparative study of 6 and 12 biopsy cores.
Takenaka A; Hara R; Hyodo Y; Ishimura T; Sakai Y; Fujioka H; Fujii T; Jo Y; Fujisawa M
Int J Urol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 16448425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Transperineal vs transrectal magnetic resonance and ultrasound image fusion prostate biopsy: a pair-matched comparison.
Kaneko M; Medina LG; Lenon MSL; Hemal S; Sayegh AS; Jadvar DS; Ramacciotti LS; Paralkar D; Cacciamani GE; Lebastchi AH; Salhia B; Aron M; Hopstone M; Duddalwar V; Palmer SL; Gill IS; Abreu AL
Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):13457. PubMed ID: 37596374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Consensus-based guidelines on prostate biopsy].
Italian Panel on Prostate Biopsy
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2005 Sep; 77(3 Suppl 1):1-2, preceding 1. PubMed ID: 16402723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy for detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
Xue J; Qin Z; Cai H; Zhang C; Li X; Xu W; Wang J; Xu Z; Yu B; Xu T; Zou Q
Oncotarget; 2017 Apr; 8(14):23322-23336. PubMed ID: 28177897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Complications of transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy.
Miller J; Perumalla C; Heap G
ANZ J Surg; 2005; 75(1-2):48-50. PubMed ID: 15740517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Transperineal prostate biopsy detects significant cancer in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and previous negative transrectal biopsies.
Dimmen M; Vlatkovic L; Hole KH; Nesland JM; Brennhovd B; Axcrona K
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E69-75. PubMed ID: 22093091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimal approach for prostate cancer detection as initial biopsy: prospective randomized study comparing transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy.
Hara R; Jo Y; Fujii T; Kondo N; Yokoyoma T; Miyaji Y; Nagai A
Urology; 2008 Feb; 71(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 18308081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multiparametric MRI/TRUS Fusion Prostate Biopsy: Advantages of a Transperineal Approach.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo GD; Pennisi M
Anticancer Res; 2017 Jun; 37(6):3291-3294. PubMed ID: 28551679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Uleri A; Baboudjian M; Tedde A; Gallioli A; Long-Depaquit T; Palou J; Basile G; Gaya JM; Sanguedolce F; Lughezzani G; Rajwa P; Pradere B; Roupret M; Briganti A; Ploussard G; Breda A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 6(6):621-628. PubMed ID: 37634971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical implementation of pre-biopsy magnetic resonance imaging pathways for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Israël B; Immerzeel J; van der Leest M; Hannink G; Zámecnik P; Bomers J; Schoots IG; van Basten JP; Debruyne F; van Oort I; Sedelaar M; Barentsz J
BJU Int; 2022 Apr; 129(4):480-490. PubMed ID: 34358388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Targeted Biopsy With Use of Electromagnetically-tracked MR/US Fusion Guidance Platform for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Winoker JS; Wajswol E; Falagario U; Maritini A; Moshier E; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():278-286. PubMed ID: 32956688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Prospective Comparison of Transrectal Standard, Cognitive, Transperineal Fusion, and Mapping Prostate Biopsy for Cancer Detection.
Petov V; Bazarkin A; Morozov A; Taratkin M; Ganzha T; Danilov S; Chernov Y; Chinenov D; Rzayev R; Suvorov A; Amosov A; Fajkovic H; Enikeev D; Krupinov G
J Endourol; 2023 Aug; 37(8):940-947. PubMed ID: 37294206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The incidence of prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen greater than 4.0 ng/ml: a randomized study of 6 versus 12 core transperineal prostate biopsy.
Emiliozzi P; Scarpone P; DePaula F; Pizzo M; Federico G; Pansadoro A; Martini M; Pansadoro V
J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):197-9. PubMed ID: 14665875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Individualization of the biopsy protocol according to the prostate gland volume for prostate cancer detection.
Eskicorapci SY; Guliyev F; Akdogan B; Dogan HS; Ergen A; Ozen H
J Urol; 2005 May; 173(5):1536-40. PubMed ID: 15821481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
